| |
Sep 01, 2003:
Did "TIME Magazine" know about the Mumbai attacks two months ago? |
|
| |
The same "TIME Magazine"
(mail@web.timeasia.com), the same
guy "Alex Perry", The same years old anti-India attitude, The same
justifying promotion of "Jihad" as "response, reaction"
to "Hindu-nationalism" under the phrase "domestic Muslim terrorists enraged by Hindu
nationalism" (Do terrorists have right to be enraged
by a nationalism?). This Perry guy starts with the same "nonsense"
figure of "Hindus killed 2,000 Muslims in Gujarat" (The fact is 400+ Muslims,
250+ Hindus and 100+ Policemen were killed during riots that were triggered
by brutal killings of 58 Hindus in Godhra by the group of 2000 local
Muslims).
Why is the Indian government allowing such "Jihadi" supporting reporters
to work from our soil? He would have been thrown out of China (even USA) if
he had dared to write such an articles supporting/justifying the "Jihadi"
bombings.
Please read this article in the light of following fact and the comments
below from one of the members:
While the Hindu minorities in Pakistan and Bangladesh have reduced from 30%
to 1% and 35% to 7% respectively, the Indian Muslim minority has grown from
8% to 12%. India is a country with "Muslim" President providing "Haj" subsidy
to "Muslims" and maximum freedom to them to the extent they can create as
many riots as they want (157 subsequent riots that happened in Gujarat were
started by Muslims) and can still complain that "Muslims are being harassed
here"
---------------
Comments from one of the members:
This article in TIME is a blatant, in-our-faces brag about their
collaboration with terrorists. They KNEW that attacks were planned in Mumbai,
and they KNEW the attackers. They KNEW that these are Pakistan-supported. Two
months ago.
How much did they pay the terrorists whom they
interviewed in the Mumbai high- rise hotel two months ago? How much of that
money went to rent bomb-taxis and buy RDX? How many innocents' blood is on
TIME's filthy hands? PLEASE publicize this and demand law enforcement action
against TIME. Thanks!
Note especially the following:
"a leader of the outlawed Student Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) met TIME
in Bombay two months ago and spoke plainly of his group's intentions to
target the city. "Umar"—a name given to him by TIME—stressed that although
his men might accept technical or financial help from fellow militants from
Pakistan or elsewhere, the terror campaign in Bombay in recent months was a
domestic response by Indian Muslims to years of discrimination at the hands
of the Hindu majority and the BJP under Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee.
"We started peacefully, and we were attacked," said Umar. "So now we attack
others. If we sit idle, then the whole world will never know how the Muslims
are being harassed here." He added ominously, "I see a dark future, a violent
future."
My question: What ELSE did the terrorist warn TIME of? How many more lives
are going to be snuffed out with the blood-money handed by TIME to the
terrorists? Do the Americans really believe that SIMI is not already in the
US?
Bloody Monday (click on this link to read complete article)
http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/article/0,13673,501030908-480330,00.html
As Bombay suffers the latest in a string of deadly bomb blasts, suspicions
focus on domestic Muslim terrorists enraged by Hindu nationalism
BY Alex Perry
|
|
|