| |
Jul 04, 2003: Troops to Iraq: To send or not to send |
|
| |
Should India send troops to Iraq or not?
Related news items and different analytical perspectives.
Rumsfeld: Desperately seeking troops
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1030702/asp/frontpage/story_2124792.asp
Decide early on Iraq Troops: US to India
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_297135,001300180038.htm
India split over sending troops to Iraq
http://in.news.yahoo.com/030623/137/25dz2.html
Annan disapproves of Indian troops in Iraq: report
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s883798.htm
To Send or Not To Send?
By: Colonel (Retd) A Sridharan, VSM
http://www.indiacause.com/OL/OL_030621_3.htm
When I was in the faculty of Defence Services Staff College at Wellington,
Nilgiris, I have heard US student officers who are taken on a forward area
tour along with other foreign officers undergoing training there, telling me,
"our troops would never operate under such hostile conditions as the Indian
army operates. We take our hats off not only to their bravery but also for
maintaining such high morale and smile on their faces while operating under
such terrible conditions of living in the forward posts and picquets".
Send in the troops
http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=26275
Early one morning in November 1988, Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi received a
telephone call from the foreign secretary of the Maldives, Ibrahim Hussein
Zaki, who told him that unknown mercenaries had invaded the Maldives and
President Gayoom had gone into hiding. Zaki appealed for immediate Indian
military intervention.
Say 'no' to America
http://www.newstodaynet.com/guest/3006gu1.htm
Yes, India can send its troops but on two conditions: The United States
apologises to the Iraqi people for the devastation it has caused and
repatriates every US soldier.
A history lesson for Delhi
http://atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/EG02Df04.html
The US pressure on India is described as a ruse to sacrifice Indian soldiers
and save American lives as the moment Indian troops land in Iraq, the US will
reduce theirs. The Americans will go back home with their heads high, of a
battle won, George W Bush's ratings will soar, while the action will shift
where it matters - to corporate boardrooms, over oil and reconstruction
doles. Meanwhile, seething Iraqis will club Indian forces with invaders, and
mete out similar treatment.
Constructive Engagement: India Must Send Troops to Iraq
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/xml/uncomp/articleshow?msid=37156
We must approach the issue from a perspective of national interest. The US
ambassador in Delhi has said that a negative decision by India will not
affect the Indo-US relationship and New Delhi's decision should be based on
calculations of national interest. It is only by agreeing to consider the
proposition of sending troops to Iraq that India will be in a position to
raise various issues with the US on the road map for an interim
administration, constitution-making, elections
America wants Indian troops in Iraq – but India must say no nicely.
http://www.indiareacts.com/archivedebates/nat2.asp?recno=655
India has no history of deploying troops outside UN command, and in this
instance, they will come under US or UK commanders, which the Indian army has
opposed, as any self-respecting army would.
India makes a meal of Iraq dilemma
http://atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/EG02Df05.html
The Indian government is tying itself in all sorts of knots over whether or
not to send troops to Iraq, when it could save itself the angst by simply
listening to the voice of its people.
|
|
|