Feedback

(The author is a Professor in International Economics in Nagasaki University, Japan)

The Baker-Hamilton Study Group Report on Iraq has demonstrated the limit on the projection of U.S. power over the globe. The report suggested gradual withdrawal of the American forces from Iraq, admitting defeat in Iraq. The declared idea of the U.S. of attacking Iraq in 2003 was to create democracies in the Middle East, although one may ask why the U.S. tolerates dictators in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan and China. The answer can be found by examining the real aim of the U.S. foreign policy today

On September 17, 2002 the Bush, administration published its “National Security Strategy of the United States of America”. The document asserts as the guiding policy of the United States the right to use military force anywhere in the world, at any time it chooses, against any country it believes to be, or it believes may at some point become, a threat to American interests. As President Bush asserts in the introduction of the document, America’s values “are right and true for every person, in every society.”

USA has selected three areas to contain possible rivals: The Middle East, East Europe and East Asia. In the Middle East the rival is militant Islam. In East Europe the rival is resurgent Russia under Putin. In East Asia the possible rival is China. However, China is now the most important partner of the U.S. corporations and as a result is not a rival as such on the political front. United States hope that by controlling the oil wealth of the Middle East it is possible to regulate militant Islam and to set it against resurgent Russia. President Clinton has tried that by supporting Bosnian Muslims against the orthodox Christians of Serbia. He has sent an army of 10000 Arab and Pakistani terrorists to Bosnia to kill the Christians. Then he has bombed Serbia into submission to give up Kosovo. During his time Chechen Muslims revolting against Russia also got supports from USA, Britain and Western Europe. Although Iraq is certainly a set back but USA will try, as suggested by Baker-Hamilton report, to develop relationships with Syria and Iran in future to eliminate any possibility of Russian influence in the Middle East. Thus, still the real rival for the USA in the world scale is Russia as the Soviet Union was before 1991.

In 1997, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the National Security Advisor of President Carter, published a book entitled The Grand Chessboard; by chessboard, Brzezinski meant Eurasia, the enormous landmass comprising two continents and containing the majority of the world’s population. He said that “America’s capacity to exercise global primacy” depends on whether America can prevent “the emergence of a dominant and antagonistic Eurasian power”. Brzezinski then concluded: “Eurasia is thus the chessboard on which the struggle for global primacy continues to be played.”

To contain Russia, USA has adopted a multi-level approach. It is trying to put false or half-truths in the international media to make Russia unpopular. USA and its western allies also support directly or indirectly the Islamic insurgency within Russia. At the same time there are serious efforts going on to encircle Russia by putting pro-Western governments in every former republics of the former Soviet Union. The recent reversal of the results of the election in Ukraine, Georgia, and Kirghizistan, in which elected presidents are replaced by new pro-Western presidents in new elections, as demanded by the mob, hired, fed, and employed by the Western organizations, is the direct result of that policy.

The election of a pro-Western presidents through dubious means for Ukraine, the birthplace of Russian nation of Kiev-Rus in 9th century, and for Georgia, the birthplace of Stalin, and Kirghizstan, the gateway to the former Soviet central Asia, means the US now occupy a crucial position on Brzezinski’s global chessboard.

In the Balkans following the war on Serbia in 1999, the former Yugoslavia is firmly under Western control. In 2001, in the context of the Afghanistan invasion, the US established military bases for the first time in former Soviet republics and emerged as a presence in Central Asia. Since then, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzistan and Azerbaijan have allied themselves to the US. In 2003, a pro-Western regime came to power in Georgia, through the mob violence as witnessed as well in Ukraine. In Europe, most members of the former Warsaw Pact, including the former Baltic Soviet republics, have now joined NATO and the European Union. When Ukraine would join, NATO. Russia would be largely isolated.

Emerging Relationship between Ukraine and USA:

The US continued with its aggressive strategy and groomed opposition candidate and the president elected in the second election Yushchenko. Donations from institutes established by Soros have helped develop and finance the Ukrainian student movement “Pora” (“It is Time”) along the lines of similar movements in Serbia and Georgia to remove pro-Russian politicians from power. Pora has been in the forefront of the demonstrations in support of Yushchenko. The US state department said recently, it had spent $65m over the past two years financing groups in support of democracy in Ukraine, part of the $1bn spent for the same purpose globally each year.
Yushchenko"s way to power was accompanied with a series of strange assassinations. The assassinations of Viktor Yushchenko's first wife, and the former chairman of the National Bank of Ukraine, Vadim Getman, were ignored by the Western media in its drive for democracy in Ukraine. Yushchenko fled Ukraine after being the finance minister, was arrested in the U.S. for theft charges but came out from the US prison when his first wife was murdered and he married an official of President Bush in a hurry. He then came back to Ukraine as the champion of democracy for Ukraine.

Threats to Russia:

With nearly 50 million inhabitants, Ukraine is, after Russia, by far the biggest of the successor states of the Soviet Union. Ukraine is connected to Russia by a common history, extending back to the Kiev-Rus in the ninth Century. During the past 300 years, the largest part of today’s Ukraine was either Russian or Soviet national territory, or both. The heavy industry of the Eastern Ukraine, developed under the Soviet regime, is closely linked with its Russian counterpart. The dissolution of these links would have damaging consequences for both countries.

An additional factor is the strategic significance of Ukraine. Eighty percent of Russian gas and oil exports to Europe—its most important source of foreign exchange—flows through Ukrainian pipelines. The main base of the Russian Black Sea fleet, Sebastopol, is also situated on Ukrainian national territory. Russia is threatened with the loss of influence over one of the most important industrial regions of the former Soviet Union and the loss of control over the export routes of its most important raw materials, oil, and gas.

Russia has planned a trade and security alliance that would incorporate some of the republics of the former Soviet Union in Central Asia, the Caucasus, and Eastern Europe, in which Russia would be the dominant power. Wherever Moscow attempts to reassert its influence, it meets with opposition from the Euro-American alliance, which has the strategic aim of incorporating Russia's periphery -- especially in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus -- into the Western system of market economy and the NATO Ukraine now is a candidate for admission to both the European Union and NATO

Affairs in Georgia:

During the Soviet Union era, most of the Soviet investment went into building up the backward, mostly Muslim nations and areas rather than Russia proper. The result is well-educated and well-organized republics such as Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Georgia, and Azerbaijan among others. These countries are sitting on top of or in close proximity to Caspian Basin oil.
After the overthrow of the Soviet Union, the United States moved to establish its strength in the Caspian area. They practically bought up Georgia, a key Caspian country. Both the former and the current head of the Georgian government, Eduard Shevardnadze and Mikhail Saakashvili, are bitterly anti-Russian and very pro-U.S. The whole war in Chechnya is nothing more than a reflection of this

The most important factor in Georgia is that the country is an essential link in the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline that will carry oil from the Caspian Sea to the West. Control over Caspian Sea oil is perceived by the Western powers, led by the United States, to be a vital strategic interest. Uppermost in Western policy towards the entire Caucasus region is the goal of sufficient political stability to guarantee that the oil will flow. Georgia's strategic importance has resulted in an American military presence in the country to train its armed forces. American firms are now building a major pipeline through this volatile area. This American presence is only likely to expand in future when the pipeline begins to transport oil and fighting in the area intensifies.

Mr. Saakashvili, who forced President Edward Shevardnadze to resign on 23 November 2003 after three weeks of peaceful demonstrations, during which the population challenged the results of the general elections that were held on 2 November 2003, has colossal support from George W. Bush himself. The result of the new election is the withdrawal of Russian military bases from Georgia and their replacements by the U.S. army, which the former president Shevardnadze had resisted.

Velvet revolution in Kyrgyzstan:

The former of Kyrgyzstan Askar Akayev said in his book "Thinking of the Future with Optimism: Ideas on Foreign Policy and the World", that, “ Installation of the new regime in Georgia is a challenge to all CIS countries. Proliferation of the technology of velvet revolutions aims to weaken the Commonwealth”. Akayev became the president in 1990 and was re-elected in 1995 and again 2000. The West and the local opposition have not recognized the election unless the pro-Western candidate Felix Kulov was elected after a mass protests resulted into reelection in Kyrgyzstan after the elected pro-Russian candidate Askar Akayev fled to Moscow in April 2005.

Empire building for Oil:

Now, as the United States wages its war in Afghanistan and Iraq and deploys troops for the first time in the energy-rich regions of Central Asia and the Caucasus, the borders of a new American empire appear to be forming. The aim is to protect the growing economic interests of USA in Central Asia and the Caucasus, which are crisscrossed by oil and gas pipelines. US Secretary of State Colin Powell said in December 2004 that Kazakhstan's oil was becoming of "critical importance”. Jane's Foreign Report said recently that "Caspian reserves could be critical to future global energy supply," This is in line with the doctrine of "full-spectrum dominance" that now seems to govern American foreign policy and is manifesting itself in the Caucasus and Central Asia".

Analysis:

In his book The Grand Chessboard, Zbignew Brzezinski, national security advisor to President Carter, urged that the U.S. take command of Central Asia and its "enormous concentration of oil and gas reserves’ in order to command all of Eurasia. Brzezinski noted that "a truly massive and widely perceived external threat" would be needed to incline the U.S. public into a "supportive mood" for engagement in international war. That was in 1997, four years before the 9/11 attacks on World Trade Center in New York. Brzezinski remembered, "the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor" as providing just such a threat or pretext.

In 2000 Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and current Defense Policy advisor Richard Perle were among authors of Project for the Next American Century (PNAC) papers, which repeated the goal of absolute U.S. supremacy. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and all the other authors share ties to the oil-and-gas and/or pharmaceutical and/or weapons-of-mass-destruction industries.
PNAC also wrote in September 2000 that the U.S. military should be transformed to a capability that let it "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars”. PNAC 2000 estimated that such a "transformation" would require defense spending to have "a minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, adding $15 billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually.” PNAC 2000 added, one year before 9/11: "The process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event–like a new Pearl Harbor.” Following the "new Pearl Harbor" of " ‘9/11’ ", the defense budget of the U.S. rose to $345.7 billion in 2002, a 12% increase from 2001. The Defense budget rose to $365 billion in 2003, not counting costs of war against Iraq, which is now about US$320 billion so far.

Russia, which was during the days of President Yeltsin impoverished and descending into social and political chaos, is now revived by Putin and by the enormous amount of wealth from exports of oil and gas. It is still armed with thousands of nuclear warheads, sprawling across Eurasia, encompassing or bordering on vast energy reserves in Eastern Siberia.

Thus, it is not surprising that the Western media is now spreading disinformation to discredit Russia. Recently when Russia has asked the hostile government of Ukraine to pay the international price for oil and gas it receives from Russia rather than having a 70 percent subsidy, western media and their government has termed that as economic blackmail of Ukraine. Suddenly a British academic with close contact with the British secret service has published a diary of a dead KGB officer defected to the West, Vasili Mitrokhin, as authentic document describing how KGB has bribed well known politicians of the world including François Mitterrand, Neil Kinnock, and Indira Gandhi along with ten Indian newspaper editors. Most recently the Western media is trying to discredit Russia by blaming for the sudden death of a former KGB officer, Alexander Litvinenko, who was defected to the West, became a Muslim and a member of the exiled Chechen terrorists living in London with close connection with Boris Berezovsky, who fled to London after stealing more than US$ 350 million from the Russian airline Aerofloat.

With the withdrawal from Iraq, exports of democracy will be redirected with full force to East Europe and the former Soviet Union. As Russia is the real obstacle on the way for this export, it is essential for the western media and the US government to discredit Russia by all means. The US Council on Foreign Relations has recently published a special report on Russia, “Russia’s Wrong Direction: What the United States Can and Should Do”, written by Jack Kemp and Senator John Edwards, the possible democratic candidate for the presidency in the next election in USA. According to it, “the power in Russia is democratic only outwardly, whereas the content of the Russian power is not democratic at all.” Vladimir Putin in reply, in his 2006 annual state of the nation address, compared the US to a hungry wolf that "eats and listens to no one".

It is now clear was the actual reason for the highly costly and ineffective regime change in Iraq was not ‘Democracy’ but control of oil and gas resources of the world. The quest for energy control has initiated the attempts for regime changes in Georgia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Belarus and Kyrgystan in recent years. It also can explain the USA’s hostility towards Lain America’s very popular democracies in Venezuela and Bolivia.


Dr.Dipak Basu

       Send your views to author

Do you wish to reach our readers? submit your guest column

Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or web listing page URL) without the prior permission from us and the author.

Previous articles by:
Dr.Dipak Basu

Singur: Reflection of China

China"s claim on Arunachal Pradesh

Indo-US nuclear Deal and its consequences

Mussaraf’s Proposal and India"s Options

Suez Crisis in 1956: the reality

Pope and the Muslims

Balochistan and The Line of Evil

Dictatorship within a Democracy

Failed Affirmative Action in India

Muslim Objection to Vande Mataram

Benefits of the British Rule in India

Mukherjee Comm & Netaji’s Disappearence

The "Rough States" and "Failed Nations"

Rupee as convertible Currency & implicatio..

Economic Roots of the French Riots

All articles by:
Dr.Dipak Basu