|
|
By: V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.
November 12, 2006
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
Related Articles:
Sathya Sai Baba – Holy Ash Exposed or Slandering the Divinity
Sundara Krishnaswami
Rape Charge on Hindu Swami - Why we need Swamis to reform?
Ganesh Sovani
Sathya Sai Baba in politics: Rebuttal
Gopal Alankar
Comment: Sri Sathya Sai Baba in politics
Sundara Krishnaswami
Puttaparthi Baba dabbles in politics
Gopal Alankar
Swami"s wake-up call to Hindus
V Sundaram
Baba Mourya: An Artist with a Mission
Shachi Rairikar
Yoga: An Overiew Dr
Vikram M Pattarkine
Swami Ranganathananda
Raghbendra JhaThat ever so boisterous, ever so heroic, ever so impetuous, ever so
youthful and ever so irrepressible stormy petrel of Indian politics Dr
Subramanian Swami has come out with a brilliantly slashing book titled
Hindus Under Siege: The Way Out. This book, blessed by H S Swami Dayananda
Saraswathy, is going to be released by S Vedantam, International Vice
President, Vishwa Hindu Parishad, at a public function in Chennai
tomorrow.
In this book Dr Subramanian Swami argues that Hindu Civilization, Hindu
Religion, Hindu Society, Hindu Culture, Hindu Way of Life? in short our
time-honored traditions of Sanatana Dharma? are all under
multi-dimensional siege today in India. The siege against Hinduismin in
all spheres ?? religious, psychological, physical and cultural? has been
described in a vivid, vital, vibrant and vigorous manner by Dr Swami. He
has eloquently argued and proved that Hindus must collectively acquire a
new mindset immediately on a war-footing to meet the growing challenge
from the international forces of Islam, Christianity, Communism on the one
hand and the domestic forces of Macaulayism, Nehruvian Secularism, Sonia's
Pan-Christendom and no less Pan-Islamic Pseudo-Secularism, wedded to the
cardinal objective of destruction of Hindu religion and Hindu society.
Hindu society is the only significant society in the world today which
presents a continuity of cultural existence and functioning since times
immemorial. Most other societies known to human history ? East and West,
North and South? have suffered a sudden interruption and undergone a
traumatic transformation in history due to the planned dastardly invasion
of latter-day ideologies ? Christianity, Islam and Communism. The
pre-Christian, pre-Islamic and pre-Communist cultural creations of these
societies are now to be met only in libraries and museums, thanks to the
labors of antiquarian scholars. According to Dr Swami, Hindu society can
meet the same frightful fate if there were no Hindu society to sustain it.
This is the point which is not always remembered even by those who take
pride in Hindu culture. If Hindus do not unite in India against the lethal
forces ? International and National ? which are working round the clock
for the destruction of Santana Dharma under the overall Generalissimo of
Sonia Gandhi's UPA Government, Hindus also run the risk of perishing like
the ancient Greeks, Egyptians or Babylonians. In his Avant Garde book, Dr
Swami has come out with radical proposals, programs and prescriptions,
letting loose his well known and complete intellectual armory? the
bludgeon from the platform, the rapier for a personal dispute, the
entangling net and unexpected trident for the Courts of Law and a jug of
clear spring water for an anxious perplexed conclave of mute and helpless
Hindus.
To quote Dr Swami's brilliant words from his introduction: "Since
achieving independence from colonial rule in 1947, we Indians have been
unsuccessfully grappling with the following question: Who are we? Are we?
This as yet unanswered question represents India's identity crisis. The
failure to date to resolve this crisis has not only confused the majority
but has also confounded the minorities as well in India. Without a
resolution of this crisis, (which requires an explicit, clear answer to
the question), the majority will never understand how to relate to the
legacy of the nation. In other words, the present dysfunctional
perceptional mismatch, between who we are as a people and the legacy of
the nation, is behind most of the communal tension and intercommunity
distrust in the country. Even in other countries such a question arises
from time to time. In the United States, following relatively liberal
immigration policies since 1965, the question has again arisen. Professor
Samuel Huntington of Harvard has tried to answer this question in his new
book: WHO WE ARE?
Dr Swami goes on to ask further equally relevant and pointed questions.
What is India? Why are we Indians? Is India an ancient nation, a
continuing civilization of thousands of years or is it a relatively recent
administrative construct of British imperialists and legalized by the
British House of Commons legislation, viz ; the Indian Independence Act of
1947 ? What is the core of India's ethos; Hindu, Secular, or Hindustani?
And what does each mean? Citizens of India are of course not sure! That is
India's identity crisis.
Unless we answer this question clearly, finally, unambiguously and
authoritatively as to who we are, Indians will flounder, flip-flop and
generally be devoid of healthy patriotism. This is not to suggest that any
person's identity is uni-dimensional. The nature of a person's questioning
mind in a pluralistic democracy makes identity a multi-dimensional
concept. But a national identity dimension is an imperative for a nation
to become vibrant and dynamic. What we are concerned with here is the lack
of a national identity, not how to make such an identity the sole concern.
When the nation is in danger, national identity must take precedence. That
is what Chanakya meant by the concept of Chakravartin. Dr Swami says that
the core fundamentals of our national identity, through a correct
perception of our history, will help to restructure and reform our society
on that basis and will make it cohesive and united. To achieve such a
restructure, of course, requires a complete de-falsification of Indian
history (now Arjun Singh's, Union Hindu Religion / Rights Destruction
Minister (HRD), all these italics within the two brackets mine!!),
rejecting that portion that has been contrived by British imperialists and
their Indian compradors ( worthies like Arjun Singh ! ), to snap the
linkages to our real past.
Sir George Hamilton, Secretary of States for India, sowed the seeds of
Two-Nation Theory of Jinnah on 26 March, 1888 when he wrote: "I think the
real danger of our rule is not now but say fifty years hence. We shall
therefore break Indians into two sections holding widely different views.
We should so plan the educational text books that the differences between
community and community are further strengthened." Dr B R Ambedkar, the
only true nationalist after our independence, had challenged this view as
far back as 1916, when as a PhD student in Columbia University, he wrote a
paper for an Anthropology Department seminar as follows: "Ethnically, all
people are heterogeneous. It is the unity of culture that is the basis of
homogeneity. Taking this for granted, I venture to say that there is no
country that can rival the Indian peninsula with respect to unity. It has
not only geographic unity, but it has over and above all a deeper and much
more fundamental unity ? the indubitable cultural unity that covers the
land from end to end". Sadly and even more so badly for all truly
nationalistic Indians (Hindus definitely not excluded!!), according to
Dr.Manmohan Singh, Arjun Singh, Sonia Gandhi and all the known political
thugs from the other political parties forming part of the utterly
pernicious alliance (UPA) today in New Delhi, Sir George Hamilton was a
truer patriot who fully supported the erection of communal Quota Raj of
UPA Government today.
A nation is a soul, a spiritual principle. Two things, which in truth are
but one, constitute this soul or spiritual principle. One lies in the
past, one in the present. One is the possession in common of a rich legacy
of memories; the other is present-day consent, the desire to live
together, the will to perpetuate the value of the heritage that one has
received in an undivided form.
Man does not improvise. The nation, like the individual, is the
culmination of a long past of endeavors, sacrifices, and devotion. Of all
cults, that of the ancestors is the most legitimate, for the ancestors
have made us what we are. A heroic past, great men, glory (by which I
understand genuine glory), this is the social capital upon which one bases
a national idea. To have common glories in the past and to have a common
will in the present; to have performed great deeds together, to wish to
perform still more these are the essential conditions for being a people.
One loves in proportion to the sacrifices to which one has consented, and
in proportion to the ills that one has suffered. One loves the house that
one has built and that one has handed down. The Spartan Song- "We are what
you were; we will be what you are" is, in its simplicity, the abridged
hymn of Hindutva today.
Swami Vivekananda said: "Arise, Awake and Go Forth as Proud Hindus". This
message forms the basis of Dr Swami's definition of the following five
maxims which should constitute the fundamentals of Hindu Unity today:
Firstly, a Hindu, and those others who are proud of their Hindu past and
origins, must know the correct history of India. They must learn the
concept of India as Hindustan (not Soniastan or Secularistan!)
Secondly, according to Hindu belief, all religions equally lead to God,
and not that all religions are equal in the richness of their theological
content. Respecting all religions, Hindus must forcefully demand from
others that such respect is a two-way obligation. Muslims and Christians
shall be part of the Hindustani parivar or family only if they accept this
truth and revere it.
Thirdy, Hindus must prefer to lose everything they possess rather than
submit to tyranny or terrorism.
Fourthly, the Hindu must have a mindset to retaliate when attacked. The
retaliation must be massive enough to deter future attacks. Fifthly all
Hindus to qualify as true Hindus must make an earnest effort to learn
Sanskrit and the Devanagiri script in addition to their own mother tongue
and must pledge that one day in the future, Sanskrit will be India's link
language since all the main Indian languages have large percentages of
their vocabulary in common with Sanskrit.
Dr Swami declares with majestic aplomb: "These five fundamentals
constitute the concept of VIRAT HINDU UNITY".
The tide of Hindutva was inaugurated by Raj Narain Bose (maternal grand
father of Aurobindo Ghosh) and Nav Gopal Mitra in undivided Bengal in the
19th century. Two strong currents of thoughts, ideals, and aspirations met
together and strove for supremacy in Bengal in those days. One was a
current of Hindu Nationalism - of the revived life, culture and ideals of
the nation that had lain dormant for centuries and had been discarded as
"lower and primitive" by the first batch of English-educated Hindus,
especially in Bengal. The other was the current of Indo-Anglicism - the
onrushing life, culture and ideals of the foreign rulers of the land,
which, expressing themselves through British law and administration on the
one side, and the new schools and universities on the other, threatened to
swamp and drown the original culture and character of the people going
back to the dawn of history.
Bankim Chandra Chatterjee offered the next milestone for those marching on
the road of Hindutva by the publication of his novel Anand Mutt in 1882.
Swami Vivekananda awakened the Indians and the Western world to the
glorious wisdom of Hindutva. Swami Dayananda Saraswathi, founder of Arya
Samaj, made us aware of our glorious Vedic heritage. Aurobindo Ghosh was
another sage whose thinking enriched the philosophy of Hindutva. In 1909
he wrote: "An Indian Nationalism, largely Hindu in its spirit and
traditions, because the Hindu made the land and the people and persists,
by the greatness of his past, his civilization and his culture, and his
invincible virility. The "Nation Idea" India never had. By this I mean the
political idea of the Nation. It is a modern growth. But we had in India
the cultural and spiritual idea of the Nation". This is the quintessence
of Hindutva. Bal Gangadar Tilak, Vir Savarkar, Dr Hegdewar, Guruji
Golwalkar have all built up this great edifice of Hindutva. Hindutva is
not a word but a history. Hinduism is only a derivative, a fraction or a
part of Hindutva or Hinduness!! Dr Subramanian Swami's new book clearly
proves that our struggle for establishing a Hindu Nation based on Hindutva
is a continuing movement, and not a condition; a sacred and eternal
journey and not a harbor.
Let me summarize the fundamentals laid down by Dr Swami for creating a new
Hindu Renaissance. The First Fundamental is the national acceptance of the
concept of India as Hindustan. Hindustan does not mean that the land
belongs to the Hindus. Even on that score a citizen has a claim to
Hindustan by birth. In fact, whoever has lived in India, has had
forefathers who were Hindus. Paradoxically, Bharat has a religious
connotation, while Hindustan does not. One has to read the Vishnupurana to
recognize that. Instead of calling "India that is Bharat", our
constitution makers should have said "India that is Hindustan". Hindustan
has to be defined as a nation of Hindus and those who accept that their
ancestors are Hindus. The concept also includes refugee minorities who
accept the core values of the Hindu culture and are therefore recognized
as a part of the Hindu nation. In other words, Dr Swami rejects the notion
of India as a multinational state as advocated by the communists and the
pseudo-secularists in the Congress and other Islam-Embracing,
Christianity-Coveting and Anti-Hindu political parties. Instead India,
that is Hindustan, has an organic cultural core which is Hindu in
character.
The Second Fundamental is the paramount national need for an Enlightened
Secularism resting on a Common Cultural Heritage. Since India is a land of
different religious faiths, we need a concept of how people bond together
and mutually accommodate their religious aspirations without conflict. He
rejects the Marxist view of secularism as Aggressive Left Secularism. In
this context he cites the example of Marxist M.Ps stupidly objecting to
our Prime Minister lighting lamps at public functions as non-secular!
Enlightened Secularism means: a) State neutrality to all religions b)
Equality of all religions before Law c) Uniform laws for all religious
groups to adhere to d) The majority has a special responsibility to foster
harmony with minorities, but necessarily founded on the concept of mutual
obligation. Minorities must thus concede majority concerns / rights as
well. Secularism cannot be a one-way obligation. e) Acceptance of
Sanskritization process for cultural integrity. Dr. Swami makes it clear
that the State and Religion are separate. The State should enact laws
which, without interfering with the essential fabric of culture and
religion, integrate society and promote a national outlook. Dr Swami
rightly observes that Nehru subscribed to the Marxist concept of
secularism and failed to define what historical roots ought to be the part
of the modern India and what was to be rejected. In the name of scientific
temper, he destroyed the soul of Mother India by rejecting most of our
glorious past as "obscurantism". It is on this vicious principle that he
rejected the concept of a Uniform Civil Code for India.
The Third Fundamental relates to the strategy for economic reform in a
globalize world. Nehru rejected the economic programs advocated by
Gandhi or Sardar Patel before independence and adopted the Soviet model.
It suited the interests of two powerful vested groups within our country:
One, the feudal compradors whose progeny during British rule received
English education and then entered the bureaucracy through Civil Service
examinations. The other group was Left-Inspired Indian intellectuals
educated in the 30s and 40s in Oxford and Cambridge (the "Kim Philby"
group). The latter group gave Nehru the necessary intellectual ballast,
and used their friendship with Nehru, to secure posts in key points in
Government, press, academic and diplomatic service in India after 1947.
The economic perspective that Dr Swami advocates for National Renaissance
is radically different from the other competing ideologies like
Capitalism, Socialism and Communism. He whole heartedly advocates the
socio-economic philosophy of Integral Humanism which was propounded by
Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya who had clearly foreseen the dangers of
globalization and mechanical imitation of the West even in the mid 1960s,
long before even the process had started. Another great intellectual
Dattopant Thengadi wrote a monograph on the conflict resolution called for
between market economy and Hindu human values. It is prudent to stay with
the globalization process and search for ways and means to carve our own
corner and niche in it. Dr Swamy advocates a new economic program to
make Hindustan's participation in the globalization process, socially
tolerable and morally adequate. Dr Swami makes out a strong case for a
national system of education designed to empower our teeming millions with
IT savvy self-employment skills, and also to develop a secular patriotic
ethos that courageously resists fundamentalism and terrorism. Such an
orientation will enable the country to remain focused on development
issues instead of the commercial or political fortunes in perpetuity of
one family called the Nehru Family!
The Fourth Fundamental has been outlined by Dr. Swami in these words: "If
a market-oriented economy that fosters self-reliance in individuals and
protects the weak through a safety net is ideal for renaissance, an
effective National Security Doctrine in which the goal is to defend the
assets of the nation and to achieve for India a polar position in the
international power structure, is best suited for the country and
conducive for our national renaissance". He clearly shows that the
national security of a nation is a composite of the GDP, defense
capability, effective and innovative population, technological capacity,
national health and environmental stability. India has been lacking in
collective political will during the last six decades of our independence
to realize India's potential to its fullest capacity mainly because of our
identity crisis. Our National Security Advisory Board is like any Rotary
Club or Lion's Club, its formal structure lacking an ideological support
framework and concept of national identity. By following the current
TERRORISM-EMBRACING NATIONAL INSECURITY DOCTRINE of the UPA government in
New Delhi, India is bound to collapse and balkanize like the USSR,
Yugoslavia, Lebanon or fragments like Columbia into separate countries or
areas with rampant terrorism, narcotic rackets and AIDS, stark poverty and
unemployment.
The Fifth Fundamental for Dr Swami is declaring Sanskrit as the link
language and Devanagiri as common script. Nothing divides our nation today
more than linguistic and caste differences. After our independence, these
differences have been promoted as a crucial plank of national policy by
the Congress Party under Nehru, Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Narasimha Rao
and now Sonia Gandhi. Dr Swami makes out a strong case for making Sanskrit
the official link language of India by adducing valid reasons. In this
context he refers to the recent discovery by NASA in USA about the
multiple uses of Sanskrit language for computer processing in the realm of
Artificial Intelligence (AI). To the chagrin and dismay of all the
anti-national pseudo-secularists in New Delhi, NASA has discovered that
Sanskrit, the world's oldest spiritual language, is the only unambiguous
spoken language on the planet.
To conclude, Hindustan must wake up to her destiny which is to revive her
spiritual culture and share it for the benefit of all mankind. This
requires that the intellectual elite of the county cease denigrating the
soul of India in hasty and superficial attempts to be secularly stupid and
modern and inhumanly humanitarian. It requires a new Hinduism that
corrects the social evils of the older Hinduism while maintaining the
greater spiritual basis of the eternal tradition for a new awakening to
Sanatana Dharma. Such an awakening is essential not only for India but for
the entire world. This in short seems to be the quintessence of
Dr.Subramanian Swamis clairvoyant message to all our countrymen in his new
book.
V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit
your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or web listing page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |
Previous articles by:
V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.
Story of Vivekananda Rock and Cross
A beam of light amidst the encircling gloom
Menacing Neo-Jinnah (Quaid-e-Azam) in U P
A Congress convict Vs the Indian constitution
Always yes to planned murder by terrorists
Political promotion of global Islamic terror
Hail! Hail! Vande Mataram
Divine melody of Dilip Kumar Roy
Shameful land of two PMs & 100 nations!
India: A failed State?
Islamic Indian Nationalism
Training "prospective" harvesters of souls
Heralding the second freedom movement
ASI and planned death of history
Haven for abetted Evangelism on stilts
All articles by:
V Sundaram, IAS, Retd. |