By: V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.
June 16, 2006
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Indian History, Destruction of Hinduism and the Truth about Marxists
CPI(M) and Karl Marx
ASI and planned death of history
"Ramakrishna deranged”....Reject this History
Is Sikhism destined for dustbin of history?
Mr. Singh, Don?t Play With The History
Book review: Marxism & Indian History
India?s Vedic History / Holocaust Museum
Letter to Washington Post on Indian History
"Rescuing India"s Hijacked History"
History of VANDE MATARAM Sadhu
Prof. V. Rangarajan
Bijamandal Temple at Vidisha is one of massive dimensions comparable
with Konarak in Orissa. It was desecrated again and again since the days
of Sultan Shamsuddeen Iltutmish who first indulged in his iconoclasm at
this site. Then followed Allaudin Kilji. His record was bettered by
Bahadur Shah of Gujarat. Finally came Aurangazeb Alamgir a renowned
champion of human compassion and deathless humanity.
During one night in the monsoon of 1991, there was heavy rain at a small
town called Vidisha in Madhya Pradesh, 40 kilometers from Bopal. The
downpour was so heavy that it washed away the wall that was concealing the
frontage of the Bijamandal Mosque established by Aurangazeb in 1682. This
Masjid is a centre of attraction for the Muslims. The Muslim clerics
called it Alamgir Masjid. But for the common people of the area it was
known as Bijamandal Mosque.
The broken and capsized wall following heavy rains in 1991, completely
exposed and brought to public light so many Hindu idols that the
Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) was left with no pseudo-secular
choice for further concealment and consignment into oblivion.
The fact to be noted is that for more than 300 years, these Hindu idols
were buried under the platform on the northern side, which was used as the
Hall of Prayer conducted especially on days of Eid. The District Collector
having control over this town in 1991, came forward to offer protection to
the Surveyors of the ASI, who were always exposed to the ever present risk
of violent wrath of bigots.
Exquisitely beautiful treasures of sculpture were retrieved by the ASI.
Many of the statues were particularly splendid, with some of them being as
high as eight feet. But the patent fact which must be noted by all
enlightened citizens in India today is that the ASI within a month
received instructions to stop further work. The officer of the ASI working
on the excavations as well as the Collector were transferred. There was
widespread public belief in all the villages around Vidisa that this was
done at the behest of the then Human Resource Development Minister at the
Centre Arjun Singh, a deathless champion of "secularism".
Is he not trying vigorously to re-write Indian History in order to hide
well-known facts relating to Islamic terrorism in India after 1000 AD?
As a lover of history, I was reading a report of inspection of this site
by Sir Alexander Cunningham who was the first Director of the
Archaeological Survey of India established by Lord Canning, the Viceroy,
in 1862. He visited this site in 1874 and 1876. This is what he wrote in
Volume X of the ASI Report: “Inside the town there is a stone Masjid
called Bijay Mandir, or the temple of Bijay. This Hindu name is said to
have been derived from the original temple Bijay Rani. The temple was
thrown down by the order of Aurangazeb and the present Masjid erected in
its place; but the Hindus still frequent it at the time of the annual
fair. By the Musalmans it is called "The Alamgiri Masjid", while Bhilsa
(earlier name of Vidisha) itself is called Alamgirpur. The building is
781/2 feet long by 261/2 feet broad and the roof is supported on four rows
of plain square pillars with 13 openings on front”.
So much by way of non-saffron, non-communal documentary evidence in favor
of the Hindu origins of this famous Mosque in Vidisha. It was Aurangazeb
who destroyed the temple known as Bijay Mandir and converted it into a
Mosque called Bijay Mandal Mosque in 1682. Royal celebrations were held at
the site to commemorate the visit of Aurangazeb to the area and he took
the opportunity of renaming Vidisha as Alamgirpur.
Though it had been known for a long time that Bijamandal was originally a
temple, namaz at Eid time continued right up to 1965. In 1965, Dr. Dwaraka
Prasad Misra was the Congress Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh. It was his
government which banned Muslim worship in what was a protected ASI
monument. It is not surprising that Dr Dwaraka Prasad Misra earned the
gratitude of most Vidishans and others in Madhya Pradesh. It was Dr D P
Misra who displayed the requisite moral courage of halting namaz in the
edifice. The Madhya Pradesh government gave a grant of Rs 40,000 for the
construction of a separate Idgaah nearby.
About 150 years before Aurangazeb's wanton act of destruction of the
Bijamandal Temple at Vidisha, Sultan Bahadur Shah of Gujarat, captured the
town of Vidisha in 1526-27. The first thing he did after capturing the
town was to desecrate the Bijay Mandir, proclaiming that the conquest of
Bhilsa (Vidisha) was in the service of Islam. This fact is recorded in
Mirat-I-Sikandri. About 200 years before him, another great humanist
called Sultan Allaudin Kilji in 1293 had also enjoyed the "devout" and
"dedicated" pleasure of damaging the Bijay Mandir. But the supreme credit
of being the Columbus of destruction of this temple in 1234 goes to Sultan
Much of the factual information in this article is based on a brilliant
article called Four Vandals, one Temple by Gargi. To quote Gargi in this
context: “Few temples have had the misfortune of getting desecrated four
times. Being a huge structure, built in solid stones, it was able to
survive and be restituted as a Mandir, three times. The ASI is still to
undo the damage perpetrated finally by Aurangazeb in 1682. Excavation work
by ASI which was stopped by Government of India in 1993-94 is yet to be
resumed. It is no doubt difficult to redeem the pristine glory of Bijay
Mandir, whose scale and dimensions are reminiscent of the Konarak Temple,
but it would be a shame if independent India allows its architectural
treasures remain in a state of desecration and buried without an attempt
even to redeem them. It is all the more unfortunate that the ASI is not
being allowed to work on the site despite pressure from local citizens”.
The credit of having converted a neutral public service organization like
the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) into a slave of
Congress-sponsored historical negationism and anti-Hindu pseudo secularism
goes wholly to the Congress Party in India after independence. Let me
contrast the shameful record of the Congress Party in India after
independence in the matter of preservation of our cultural heritage and
ancient monuments with that of Lord Curzon, Viceroy of India during 1899
to 1905. He took special interest in the Archaeological Department. It was
he who was responsible for the passing of the Ancient Monuments
Preservation Act in 1904.
Lord Curzon is remembered for the care he gave to India's great monuments,
not only to the new ones celebrating the British Raj, but also India's
ancient heritage, many of which were in desperate need of conservation. He
showed great sensitivity and refinement in his appreciation of Hindu and
Muslim art. He was determined to ensure that the beauty of the past should
be preserved and those monuments of historical interest and aesthetic
value in India be restored and preserved. He brushed aside the specious
argument that it was not the duty of a Christian Government to preserve
the monuments of pagan art or the sanctuaries of an alien faith. He
believed that art and beauty and the reverence that was owing to all that
had evoked human genius or had inspired human faith, were independent of
particular creeds and insofar as it touched religion, were embraced and
united by the common religion of all mankind. Lord Curzon wrote
emphatically in this context: “There is no principle of artistic
discrimination between the Mausoleum of the Muslim despot and the
Sepulchre of the Christian or Muslim Saint or a Hindu monument or temple.
Whatever is beautiful, whatever is historic and whatever that tears the
mask off the face of the past and helps mankind to read its riddles and
not the dogmas of a primitively combative theology these are the criteria
by which a responsible Government in India must be guided in its approach
to preservation of monuments. I cannot conceive of any obligation more
strictly appertaining to a supreme government than the conservation of the
most beautiful and perfect collection of monuments in the world, or one
more likely to be scamped and ignored by a delegation of authority to
The conservation work done by the dedicated Officers and men of the
Archaeological Survey of India from 1862 to 1947 was indeed remarkable and
glorious. It could well be described as the golden age of Archaeology in
India. The British Officers and men of the ASI conducted their work with
complete objectivity. Regardless of whether it was a Hindu or a Muslim or
a Christian monument, their efforts to preserve were the same and their
description was always impartial. All these great traditions in the field
of preservation and conservation of ancient and timeless monuments were
destroyed by pseudo-secular men like Nehru, Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi
and Narasimha Rao with consummate skill and organized pseudo-secular
unscrupulousness. Today this great responsibility of destruction of our
cultural and spiritual heritage is being jointly shouldered by a Catholic
Christian & a Pseudo-secular Pagan—I mean the immortal and indispensable
Sonia Gandhi and mortal and dispensable Arjun Singh!!
To conclude in the beautiful words of Gargi: “A visit to Vidisha would
enable any enlightened visitor to emotionally understand and appreciate
that there is a lingering below the surface resentment against the
Government treatment of what they believe to be their dearest treasure,
architectural as well as sentimental. The moral of a pilgrimage to Vidisha
is that no purpose would be served by hushing up what is a naked history.”
V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or web listing page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author.
Previous articles by:
V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.
Haven for abetted Evangelism on stilts
Are Kashmiri Pundits abandoned dregs?
Nehruism, communism and secularism!
Forgotten prophet of Indian nationalism
Dark Side of Christian History
The Da Vinci tsunami
Enmity of State-Sponsored Quota Raj
Is Sonia above law?
Heroic pseudo-secular much ado about..
Lurid drama of proselytism post 1947
"Convert! Migrate! Or Perish!"
Terror of Secularism!
Congress crucifixion of Mahatma Gandhi
Fatal "AIDS" of pseudo-secularism
All articles by:
V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.