|
|
By: V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.
May 21, 2006
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
The Supreme Court while granting bail to Kanchi Sankaracharya indicted
the then Tamilnadu Government for having foisted a case on Kanchi
Sankaracharya in gross violation of the established tenets and spirit of
criminal law. When Kanchi Sankaracharya was arrested in November 2004 on
Deepavali Day, the UPA Government in New Delhi maintained an attitude of
"strategic", "suave" and "secular" silence. When anything relates to Hindu
Religion or Hindus, the UPA Government either overtly or covertly makes it
very clear that it is no part of the allotted duty or constitutional
responsibility of the Government of India to interfere in such religious
matters. But the same UPA Government is always in a state of combat
readiness to rush to the rescue, relief and succour of terrorists of
Jihadic Islam or Angels of Service of Compassionate Christianity as and
when required. I am not therefore surprised that the Chief Minister of Goa
has convened an immediate cabinet meeting to consider the objections
raised against the premiere of the controversial film called "The Da Vinci
Code" in Goa and all other parts of India on May 19, 2006. The Goa
Government has passed a resolution to ban the movie and has also asked the
Centre to impose a nationwide ban on the film. Goa Chief Minister
Pratapsinh Rane said on Tuesday that he would write to the Censor Board
"either to censor or stop the release" of the controversial film in the
State.
The plot of the fictional novel The Da Vinci Code concerns the discovery
of historical evidence, concealed by the church, that Christ and Mary
Magdalene were married and began a bloodline that continued through the
centuries. It depicts Christianity as the biggest cover-up in history.
The Da Vinci Code has run into its fair share of controversies with the
Vatican calling for a ban on the film. With barely two days left before
the movie hits cinema halls across the globe, the Indian chapter has run
into some turbulence.
The Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry in our country has said
that clearance will not be given to the movie till it is screened before
the Catholic Churches" Association of India (CCAI). Trouble had started
brewing when over 200 Catholic organizations had submitted a petition
against the screening of the film to I&B Minister, Priyaranjan Dasmunsi. A
Ministry official has said that Dasmunsi will see the movie on Wednesday
but will seek the opinion of CCAI before taking a decision on whether the
movie can be released in India.
Speaking against the controversial film, Father Donald D" Souza of the
Catholics Bishops Council said, "In a country where people are still
learning about Christianity, such films can be quite harmful. We don't
want people to imbibe a wrong view of this religion in India." When
American President Bush is fighting against the terrorists of Islam in the
Middle East, the Christians in India should not make the political mistake
of responding warmly to the offer of so called help from Muslim clerics in
organizing demonstrations against the release of the controversial film on
May 19, 2006 in Mumbai. It is a known fact that a large number of
Christians have been killed in Pakistan as part of an exercise of ethnic
cleansing of Christians after 1947. Against this background, Christians
should think twice and act with great circumspection before accepting any
help from compassionate Mullahs and Moulvis of terrorist Islam.
While Priyaranjan Dasmunsi is greatly concerned about the release or
non-release of the controversial film "The Da Vinci Code", the interesting
point to be noted is that no other major country, including those where
Catholics are in a majority, have so far moved to stop the release of the
film. One of my friends was in France last week and he saw that Paris was
full of large and colorful posters relating to the release of the film
"The Da Vinci Code" on May 19, 2006. During his tour of Europe, he noticed
that the position was no different in Italy, Germany, Austria, Belgium,
Holland and many other European Countries. The French Government have not
imposed any ban on the premiere of the film at the Cannes Film Festival on
May 19, 2006. The ever-muddling Ministers of UPA Government should not
brashly dismiss the response of Government of France in regard to "The Da
Vinci Code" controversy as an offshoot of paganism or heathenism! France
is a known Catholic country and is a secular state where all religious
faiths and denominations are represented. The religious composition of the
population in France is as follows:
* Catholics: 47,000,000, 81.4% of the population
* Moslems: 4,000,000, 6.89% of the population
* Protestants: 950,000, 1.64% of the population
* Jews: 600,000, 1% of the population
* Buddhists: 400,000, 0.68% of the population
* Orthodox: 200,000, 0.34% of the population
• Others: 4,700,000, 8.12% of the population
•
Against this background, I would like to ask the Government of India as to
what is the earthshaking "SECULAR" motive that moves them into the field
of combative action in regard to the question of a ban or otherwise on the
release of the controversial film "The Da Vinci Code" on May 19, 2006?
While many countries of Africa are in the grip of AIDS, India is in the
vicious grip of the AIDS of what I call "secularism". What is the true
meaning of "secularism" in governance and Government? Secularism means the
neutrality of the State, local Government and all public services in
matters relating to one or more religions or to one or more creeds. In
France, the secularity of the State was established in 1905 by the law of
separation of Church and State. Secularists in countries like France and
U.S.A., regardless of their religious preferences, believe that religious
considerations should be excluded from civic affairs and public education.
This meaning of the term "secularism" is very much different from the
meaning of the same word in the field of philosophy. Secularism in the
field of philosophy means the belief that life can be best lived by
applying ethics, and the universe best understood, by processes of
reasoning, without reference to a god or gods or other supernatural
concepts. The UPA Government and the Congress party are "secular" in
neither of these senses.
When Rome was burning Nero was fiddling. When Jammu and Kashmir is being
cleansed ethnically by forcefully throwing out and brutally murdering all
the peace-loving Hindus in a systematic manner by the compassionate
Mujahedins of Islam, the UPA Government with its known contempt for and
hatred of all things Hindu, is only fiddling with non-issues like release
or non-release of commercial controversial films like "The Da Vinci Code".
They are giving a clear message to the effect that all the Hindus of India
in majority are non-citizens in respect of matters concerning their life
and death.
The Roman Catholics of France can in no way be dismissed as superstitious
pagans by the Christians of India. In its romantic passion for Christian
vote bank politics, the UPA Government should not try to outwit or
outsmart the "secular" French Government in the matter of release or
otherwise of the controversial film. The Government of France seems to be
confident that the Roman Catholic citizens in their country will not vote
against them just on the basis of this one decision relating to the
release of a controversial film. Roman Catholic Christians in France are
known for their maturity and political understanding.
A Commentator called Dick Rolfe of the Dove Foundation, which encourages
production of family-friendly films, has cautioned that if Christians
protest too loudly, they can end up making the mistake of calling
attention to a movie that otherwise may not do very well at the box
office.
Another Commentator has observed: "All in all, the Christian response to
The Da Vinci Code has ranged from ignorance and apathy to a passionate
defense of the faith carried out in debunking books, blogs, TV specials,
Bible studies, and water cooler discussions... and on the sides of
minivans. Instead of boycotting the book and the movie, let's be ready
with answers."
A senior Vatican official has called for only a boycott of The Da Vinci
Code, while the Council of Churches in Jordan and Roman Catholic activists
in India want their governments to ban the film altogether. But something
very different is taking place in USA. What's notable in the U.S.A. is
that boycotts are taking a back seat to anti- "Da Vinci" books and
teaching sessions about the true meaning and glory of the Gospels. Union
I&B Minister Priyaranjan Dasmunshi cannot try to outdo the Pope in Vatican
who has only said "boycott the Movie and stop short of demanding a ban on
the film".
V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit
your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or web listing page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |
Previous articles by:
V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.
Is Sonia above law?
Heroic pseudo-secular much ado about..
Lurid drama of proselytism post 1947
"Convert! Migrate! Or Perish!"
Terror of Secularism!
Congress crucifixion of Mahatma Gandhi
Fatal "AIDS" of pseudo-secularism
Planned massacre & Pak flag on Red Fort
An intellectual Kshatriya
The mysterious end of Dr S P Mookerjee
Dr Mookerjee, A fearless Hindu nationalist
Planned sabotage of the Constitution
Washed clean!
An object of electoral worship
Arjun Singh"s fatwa against things Hindu
All articles by:
V Sundaram, IAS, Retd. |