|
|
By: Tara Dhakal
May 05, 2006
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
Has quota system really achieved its purpose in Sikkim? Or was it just
another vote bank for politicians? Let’s talk about this quota system in
Sikkim and how the government strategy to address the issue of
marginalization of certain communities has reinforced its perpetuation
leading to conflict and disturbing communal harmony accompanied with the
shift in oppression among rich and the poor.
In an Indian society, “the rigid caste -based hierarchal structure, with
ascending order of privileges and descending order of disabilities” (Dholakia,
n.d.) led to some sections of the society as socially, economically,
politically and educationally backward. The dominant groups, the
privileged, are the ones who are in the upper hierarchy of the society and
the subordinate groups, the underprivileged, occupy the lowest hierarchy
of the society. The oppression of those at the lowest rung of the ladder
is based on their position of hierarchy and the magnitude of oppression is
different for all these groups. The dominant or the privileged group is
divided within itself into a main group and sub groups, just as the
underprivileged or subordinate group is also subdivided. The dominant
groups have access to all kinds of resources and restrict the subordinate
group from gaining access to these resources, which made them become a
marginalized section of the society. This as an oppression that involves
hierarchy. The quota system reserves a certain percentage of seats in
educational institutions, government employment and political arena to
include SC, ST and OBC so that they can gain access to education,
employment and politics which otherwise would not have been possible
because of their oppression by the dominant group. In addition to this,
the constitution also made a special provision that allowed any state to
include socially and educationally backward populations to the category of
STs, SCs and OBCs to uplift them (Dholakia, n.d.).
In Sikkim, there are three communities, the Lepchas, Bhutias and Nepalese.
The majority are the Nepalese who constitute 75% of the total population.
The Bhutias and Lepchas were included in the scheduled tribe (ST) s of the
1980s and Magars, Murmis, Tamangs, Gurungs, Rais, Limbus who are the other
backward classes (OBC). The status as SCs was given along with STs but as
OBCs and NBCs (Privileged) five years back only (Sikkim Human Development
Report, 2001). Taking advantage of the Indian constitution provision of
state to include backward sections of the society for their betterment
through this quota, the present government of Sikkim with Chief Minister
Pawan Kumar Chamling, an OBC now segregated the Nepalese community by
categorizing a few groups who were from his ethnicity and included them in
the OBCs categories. This categorization was not based on the economic
status of those communities but was to defy the some privileged
communities and to reverse discrimination from the general class. The
vested interest of such politicians disturbed the communal harmony between
three communities in Sikkim and aroused suspicion, conflict and
discrimination amongst these groups. In my view, the main aim of the quota
was to reduce oppression, but even after fifty years after its
implementation, the oppression has not been reduced but has taken
different forms. The reserved seats in many areas could be accessed by the
main group of the subordinate group and as well by those from better socio
economic status/upper class of the subordinate group
In Sikkim, this has reinforced discrimination among the subordinate groups
itself because of the economic class differences. The benefit of this
reservation has not reached the ones who deserve it the most. Some
individuals from the subordinate group who gained access through this
reservation benefited. They gained power, economic status, and occupied
high posts in employment. They migrated to urban areas where the basic
infrastructure was good. They could afford to send their children to
public schools; their children got good facilities and scored good grades.
The quota system enabled their easy entry in educational institutions,
employment etc. This cycle continues which leads to wide disparities of
rich and poor even in the subordinate groups. The poor person from that
subordinate group with low socio economic status had to send his child in
the village school with no quality education and facilities. Thus, the
child gets very low grades that hinder him from competing with the public
educated child of the same subordinate group. In STs that include the
Bhutias and the Lephas, the Lepcha populations was left behind and are
still at the margins of development because the Bhutia’s who were better
off than them and took advantage of the quota. This is a clear example to
show how some groups overcome oppression and others do not. This led to
the birth of another form of oppression by forming the lower socio
economic class in the subordinate groups who are oppressed the most. This
has increased the magnitude of oppression of those poor people even within
the subordinate group.
While observing such process in Sikkim, I feel, after the quota system was
introduced, especially of OBC categories, I wondered on what basis they
were included. When I passed high school, I wanted to be a doctor and was
waiting for a medical quota to come to my state for people in Sikkim
because our state did not have any medical college at that time. I had
higher grades than my best friend who was an ST but since she had the
privilege of quota, she got admissions into medical school but I did not.
She was from a higher socioeconomic status, but I was from lower middle
class with the caste as my privilege, but my privilege had nothing to do
with my socio economic status. Even though I was from the “so called “
privilege caste, I struggled a lot to complete my education, I have faced
competition in all spheres of life and my commitment to win and achieve
success is my own effort and it did not come to me by my caste. I have not
shaped my career due to my privileged caste but it was my own effort.
Sometimes it needs ones effort to overcome hurdles in life.
Tara Dhakal
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit
your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or weblisting page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |
Previous articles by:
Tara Dhakal
---- |