|
|
By: Vrndavan Parker
March 09, 2006
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
Currently, the Islamic community is in an uproar. Shocked at the western
media’s flagrant disregard for the sensitivities and traditions of Islam,
Muslims are protesting around the world.
While the western world, generally, sees it to be an issue of free speech
versus faith-based intolerance, the reality is something different. In
order to gain an accurate understanding of the crisis, one needs to
immerse oneself into the realm of ancient traditions of the heart and
spirit.
For a Muslim, the Prophet represents everything hopeful, liberating,
forgiving, honorable, just, and sacred in a profane world. There is
gratitude, warmth, love, friendliness, and kindness in the one figure of
Mohammed.
In ancient cultures, the relationship between the faithful and the object
of faith is not just one of belief, it is a matter of the heart and spirit
rather than a part-time activity or a whimsical flavor-of-the-month
approach to spirituality. The traditional approach to faith is intensely
personal. So when the Prophet Mohammed is ridiculed, it is as if a burning
arrow has pierced the heart of every Muslim. Not so much because of any
religious based emotional belief system, but because a personality dear to
the heart and spirit is being abused. In a world of injustice, pain, and
suffering, Mohammed’s message has brought peace and hope to billions. The
love and gratitude of the Umma for Mohammed’s message is the basis of
their intense displays in defense of Mohammed.
The global Hindu community shares a common heritage with a majority of the
world’s Muslims. Traditional concepts such as familial loyalty, communal
solidarity and respectful recognition of matters of the heart and spirit
are the foundation to harmony, stability, and a productive community. They
are not optional, but rather are the bedrock of civilization. Therefore,
it is no surprise that Hindus understand the angst and consternation of
the Islamic community when the very essence of their spirit is ridiculed.
For a Hindu, all spiritual expression is sacred and worthy of respect.
This is evident by the vast and diverse Universe that is Hinduism. Thus,
the Hindus stand in solidarity with the Muslims and condemn the media’s
blatant misrepresentation of Mohammed the Prophet. It can only be hoped
that a common cause of respect, honor and courtesy can be developed
amongst Muslims and Hindus. Unfortunately, such solidarity is not the
normal state of affairs. The world is quite familiar with the calls for
justice and respect in regards to Islam. Unfortunately, such a concern is
rarely, if ever, displayed by Islamic leaders and personalities in regards
to the sensitivities of non-Abrahamic communities. Interfaith efforts by
the Islamic community rarely involve anyone other than the “Peoples of the
Book” i.e. Jews, Christians, and Muslims.
The historic record is riddled with atrocities and outrages committed
against Buddhists, Sikhs, and Hindus. Yet a majority of these incidents
are ignored or denied. The blatant destruction of Afghanistan’s ancient
Buddha’s of Bamiyan in 2001 was by far one of the most brutal assaults on
the heart, spirit and traditions of the ancient world, yet the Islamic
community was unmoved.
For American Hindus, Mr. Saleem Syed’s “Young Tarang” radio show incident
is still a raw memory. In this Houston, Texas Islamic radio show, Dr. Syed
Mohammed Khaliq completely misrepresented the Hindu scripture, the
Bhagavad-Gita, and the beloved Lord Krsna. As an outsider to the Hindu
tradition, Dr. Khaliq quoted the wrong source and presented a completely
skewed view of Krsna. Lord Krsna has been a subject of intense research,
devotion, and admiration for thousand of years. His various activities
have been the focus of scholarly interpretation and inspiration. Similar
to the Muslims who do not accept misrepresentation of Allah and His
Prophet Mohammed, Hindus do not accept the concept of an unfulfilled
divinity. In the Hindu scriptures, Krsna is never represented with the
hankerings and cravings of a mortal being. In other words, when Lord Krsna
steals the clothes of the Gopis and performs the Rasa Dance, he is
engaging in Divine play or ‘lila’ that is a direct response to the
aspirations of the faithful. It is not His own urges He seeks to fulfill,
for Krsna is already complete. Thus not only did Krsna steal the clothes
of the Gopis, He also lifted a mountain on His little finger. Krsna also
claimed to be time itself and exhibited the gigantic Universal Form.
Ancient sources reveal a Krsna that is greater than a mere role model, but
a focus of worship and devotion for billions of people.
As long as those unfamiliar with a tradition publicly present inaccurate
and questionable perspectives, outrage and anguish is sure to follow. So
while condemning the questionable and inaccurate portrayal of Mohammed,
the Hindu community is disheartened that to this day Dr. Khaliq and Mr.
Saleem Sayed’s “Young Tarang” radio show have yet to apologize for its
misrepresentation of Lord Krsna. When the heart of a community is in pain,
that trauma needs to be addressed. For whether it is an assault on the
heart of Muslims or of Hindus, it is still the heart that is being
savaged. If the Muslim community begins to value the sensitivities of
Hindus and others as much as they value their own, a new era of communal
harmony can surely be attained.
Vrndavan Parker
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or weblisting page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |
Previous
by:
Vrndavan Parker
---- |