|
|
By: Apratim Verma
February 20, 2006
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
Indian politics is dirty. We all agree over that. Indian politicians are
corrupt. There is even more agreement. That national parties in India have
indulged in sabotage and treason inspired by foreign ideological gurus
(shall we refer to Mitrokhin, Volcker or anybody else?), and even
governments have taken donations to fuel foreign ideologies in India,
elicits an even louder ‘yes’ from Indians. That presents us with a black
face of Indian politics. Doesn’t it? But wait! Things are not so bad.
There is a purifier, an amrita, an ideological Ganga which washes away all
the dirt of Indian politics. Guess what it is?
Secularism. What else?
Secularism indeed is the cleansing agent of Indian Politics. For 60 years
it has washed away the sins of politicians. Some say that Indian Politics
is very complicated. On the contrary, it is very simple. There is only one
rule in the Realpolitik grammar of India. You want to commit a crime? No
probs. Do it. But do it the Secular way.
In India a crime is a crime, until it becomes a secular one. The moment a
crime becomes secular, it ceases to be one. With the transforming touch of
Secularism a crime mutates into the service of the poor, the masses and
the nation, and in worst scenario it passes unnoticed. So, secularism in
India is not just a purifying agent, it is an electron cloud with a minus
charge on it. It reverses the direction of a particular event or deed
completely. A crime in general becomes a favor to masses in Secular
terms.
About a year ago, an issue over the insult of Gandhi was raked up. The
instigator was none other than Mani Shankar Aiyer, the secularist cum
Communist par excellence of India. The new shining portfolio of Petroleum
ministry, and the defeat of supposedly ‘non-secular’ BJP had added ammo to
his Communist salvos, and boosted his secular morals.
The issue was that of a slab with the name of Veer Savarkar engraved on
it, which was displayed on a pillar in the jail of Andaman and Nicobar
islands, where the leader had been imprisoned by the British. Mani Shankar
Aiyer had charged that this was an insult of Gandhi. Now one wonders what
an innocent little slab of marble with only the name of Veer Savarkar
engraved on it, could have done to offend the Secular emotions. But
Secularism is a touchy ideology and Secularists, sentimental creatures.
Mr. Aiyer’s logic was that since the name of fanatic Hindutvawadi (an
ignominious breed, ungrateful enough to be present in India) like Veer
Savarkar was present on the slab, the absence of a slab with Gandhi’s name
was a great insult to the Mahatma.
Now, common human logic tells us that the names of only those freedom
fighters must be engraved in the Andaman and Nicobar jail, who were really
imprisoned there. But Secularism is not common, and human logic is
unworthy of the lofty ideals of Secularism.
Much hullabaloo followed the chivalrous deed of our Secular knight. But
Mr. Aiyer being true to the Secular ethos, remained absolutely defiant and
insolent in his obstinacy and got the slab removed from the pillar. So
much for the victory of Secularism. Now we must turn to another recent
event.
The chief guest of this Republic Day Parade was none other than Saudi
King, an autocrat ruling over an extremist Wahabi Islamic State, financing
terrorism and producing terrorism at supersonic pace. While Indian
Secularists and Communists leave no breast unbeaten in denouncing the
Hindu King of Nepal because he has suspended democracy in order to combat
with the Maoist menace, they have not even a single time implored the
Saudi dictator to renounce his throne and bring democracy to Saudi Arabia.
Moreover, while the Nepali King gets the regular bashing by our Secular
Armada in all of leading Indian dailies, the Saudi King gets both an
invitation to India on the Republic Day, plus a red carpet treatment by
Indian media. The ‘doublespeak’ of our Secular Armada is quite evident
with this partiality towards the Muslim dictator and the animosity towards
the Hindu King of Nepal.
Things would still be bearable for the infinitely patient Indian populace,
but it did not stop over here. Saudi King while on his tour in Delhi with
his counterparts skipped Rajghat, the samadhi of Mahatma Gandhi.
Now by analyzing the history of Secularism and applying deterministic
logic, one reaches to the conclusion that the disrespect of Mahatma Gandhi
of such a great degree would produce an insuppressible din from the
Leftists, Congressites, Secularists and Communists all of those who
vouchsafe the legitimacy of all their actions by allying themselves to his
prophet like charisma.
But Secularism is not deterministic. It is chaotic in nature. Nobody can
ever what predict what course it will take. The ever-screaming throats of
our Secularists suddenly went quiet. Not a single howl was heard form our
Teutonic Knights of Secularism. This act of Saudi autocrat was never
considered as an insult to Gandhi. So, the lesson we learn from this
episode is that you can insult Gandhi, but only through the secular way.
These two events show us the extent to which our Secularists can perfect
the ‘doublespeak’ and double standards. Now if one is trying to discover
the truth about Indian Secularism, his search ends here. In plain terms
Indian Secularism is an intense hatred of everything India and Hindu,
whether it be history, culture, religion or literature. It is a cover for
Islamic apologism and Muslim appeasement. It is a facilitator of the
Christian Missionary agenda in India.
Overall, it is anti-national in character. We need not go into the debate
of genuine secularism or pseudo-secularism, or about the origin of
secularism in Europe. By observing Indian Secularism, one can easily guess
its aims and intentions. Even, the slightest observation reveals the
‘doublespeak’ of Secularists in India, their animosity towards ancient
Indian culture and their partiality of Islamic fundamentalism, Christian
proselytism, Maoist terrorism and every other form of subversive agendas
and anti-nationalisms.
But how great a specialist you may be of Indian Secularism it will always
leave you gasping for breath by its U, M, W and Z turns. At last the
clownish somersaults of Secularism elicit a laugh from Indians, and they
wonder whether they must dispense with jokers, for a better replacement in
the Secularists.
According to the survey of an American daily, India is the happiest nation
in the world, despite its social, political and economical worries. I
wonder, whether Secularism is the cause for this happiness!
Apratim Verma
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or web listing page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |
Previous
by:
Apratim Verma
---- |