By: B Shantanu
January 07, 2006
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
The fears
I had for a while now are “official”. I am talking of the recent
earthquake in PoK (Oct ’05) and parts of Kashmir and the subsequent
millions in aid that have been promised to the region.
While the
need for aid and assistance is undeniable, the concern that I had for some
time now was that in the absence of proper distribution channels and
adequate oversight, much of it would find its way into “jihadist” coffers,
thus further strengthening the ISI-sponsored terrorist activity in
Kashmir.
The first
confirmation of my fears came early.
Here is
what
Indrani Bagchi and Rajat Pandit wrote in
The
Times of
India
on Oct 10, ’05, two days after the quake1:
“Indian officials are now also concerned about the diversion of the flood
of international aid to
Pakistan
in the aftermath of the earthquake. After 9/11, a series of international
finance laws by the UN and US had effectively shut off the funding tap
from Islamic charities, which were being used to fund jehad by outfits
like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed. The earthquake opens
Pakistan
to funds from all manner of organisations in the world, and Indian
officials fear that some of these may be diverted to oil the jehadi wheels
again…”
The very
real prospect of relief aid being diverted to fund Jihadi terrorism did
not go un-noticed by the international media either. In a report on Nov 28
in
Der
Spiegel
(the largest selling German newspaper) titled, “Can
the Survivors Survive?”, this is what Susanne Koelbl wrote2:
“…The
rescue campaign in the mountainous region has in effect become a battle
for the hearts and minds of the survivors, a competition amongst the
Pakistani army, the Americans and various Islamic religious groups. Javel
ul-Hassan, a teacher of Islamic studies in Muzaffarabad, says his Muslim
brothers from the "Society of Preachers" Jamaat-ud-Dawa, arrived on the
scene with shovels and pickaxes to rescue the injured from the rubble and
care for the survivors only two hours after the earthquake struck.
The
"Preachers" are an offshoot of the banned militant group Lashkar-i-Toiba,
which trained its supporters to launch attacks on the Indian army. Now
Jamaat-ud-Dawa operates well-organized field hospitals in the disaster
region and uses donkey caravans in an attempt to reach even the most
remote villages. Wearing the long beard of the strictly devout, Hassan
says that Jamaat-ud-Dawa has more than 15,000 active supports in Kashmir,
most of them volunteers from the group's own schools and madrassas…”
Lest
anyone forgets, the
Taliban also started almost as “harmlessly” more than a decade ago
from the madrassas in North West Frontier Provinces in Pakistan, along the
border with Afghanistan3 that were meant to “educate” the poor
orphans from the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.
The
Lashkar’s similarities with Taliban were also picked up in this report in
the New York Times datelined October 18th, titled, “In
a Remote Camp, Help From an Unconventional Source”4:
“Much
like the Afghan mujahedeen parties of the 1980's, Lashkar-e-Taiba was a
political organization that ran relief programs, medical services and
schools, in particular in camps for Kashmiri refugees. The group has
turned out tens of thousands of radical Islamic students over the years,
as well as training and supplying an estimated 200,000 fighters for the
fight against security forces in Indian-run Kashmir…
…Jamaat
ud-Dawa is known to run training camps and mujahedeen activities on both
sides of the Line of Control, which separates the two regions of Kashmir.
Two of those camps were badly damaged in the earthquake, and hundreds of
Lashkar-e-Taiba militants died, according to mujahedeen interviewed around
Muzaffarabad”
A day
earlier, in a report by Tim McGirk from Islamabad, “Picking
Up The Pieces”,
TIME
Magazine
mentioned that5:
“…worryingly, Islamic radical groups were the first to bring aid to
Pakistani villages, which may boost their popularity …
….Organized and hardworking, the jihadis seized on the catastrophe to
blame Musharraf's alliance with the
U.S. in
the war on terror for incurring Allah's wrath. The quake may have
helped the radicals' cause. In Chehla Bandi village, members of an
outlawed organization known as Lashkar-e-Taiba, sympathetic to al-Qaeda,
were the first rescue workers to arrive. They cooked food, helped to bury
the dead and shoveled through the debris to find the living. "They saved
us when nobody came from the government," says one survivor, Ali Geelani,
28, "and if they ask me, I will go for jihad with them..."
Regardless of who was reporting, the role of Jamaat-ud-Dawa was
prominently mentioned in almost all the stories about relief efforts in
the region. The Jamaat is of course nothing else but a front organisation
of the (banned) Lashkar.
While the
creation of Jamaat-ud Dawa gave Lashkar a “legitimate” cloak for its
activities, it was the earthquake (and its relief efforts in the
aftermath) that pushed Jamaat to the frontline of relief efforts in the
region. In the process of course, it also gained enormous goodwill and
credibility from the occupants of the Valley – thus creating a ready-made
support base for continuing the “Jihad” against India - something that
otherwise would have taken years and significant resources to build.
With its
pretensions towards being a charity, the Jamaat evades sanctions and any
ban on its activities while also acting as a conduit for channelling money
to the cause of “Jihad” in Kashmir. Worse, by highlighting its relief
efforts and its reach, the organisation can credibly claim to be the most
effective channel for distributing aid amongst the victims and thus garner
an even larger share of the aid amounts.
In a
report dated October 16th ’05, this is what the
Washington Post
had to say about
Jamaat and Lashkar6:
“MUZAFFARABAD, Pakistan, Oct. 15 -- The army was slow to respond, and
international aid agencies are in some ways just getting started. But
here amid the rubble and the rain at the heart of Pakistan's earthquake
zone, the zealous foot soldiers of Jamaat ul-Dawa, one of the country's
most prominent Islamic extremist groups, are very much in evidence…Jamaat
ul-Dawa is no ordinary charity. Founded in 1989 under a different name, it
is the parent organization of Lashkar-i-Taiba, one of the largest and
best-trained groups fighting Indian forces in the disputed Himalayan
province of Kashmir. Lashkar-i-Taiba has been linked by U.S. authorities
to al Qaeda and in 2002 was banned by Pakistan's government as a terrorist
organization...
Jamaat ul-Dawa is one of several hard-line Islamic groups that have
assumed a prominent role in relief operations following the devastating
Oct. 8 earthquake in Pakistani-controlled Kashmir and adjacent areas...
…Other groups with a visible presence on Saturday in Muzaffarabad, the
largest town in the area, were the charitable wing of Jamiat-i-Islami, an
Islamic political party with ideological links to the Palestinian militant
group Hamas; and the Al-Rasheed Trust, a Karachi-based charity whose U.S.
assets were frozen by the Bush administration in 2003 on grounds that it
channeled funds to al Qaeda. The group has denied the charge and says it
is focused purely on social welfare…”
The
Washington Post article also noted that:
“…Lashkar-i-Taiba
operated for years with the blessing of Pakistan's Inter-Services
Intelligence Agency, which provided the group with arms and training and
helped launch its fighters across the cease-fire line separating Pakistani
and Indian forces in
Kashmir.
It was founded by Hafiz Sayeed, a former Punjab University engineering
professor who also started Jamaat ul-Dawa. The two groups shared the same
headquarters in the town of Muridke near Lahore…
During the height of the insurgency in the 1990s, Lashkar-i-Taiba fighters
assembled openly in Muzaffarabad and nearby training camps. In early 2002,
under intense pressure from the United States, Musharraf banned the group
and froze its assets. Sayeed was subsequently arrested, although a
Pakistani court later ordered his release…”
Sadly
however, none of the reports did any in-depth follow up on the links
between the Jamaat and Lashkar and the certainty of some (if not most) of
the money flowing into Jihadi coffers.
I had
given up on anyone seriously taking up this issue when, last week, this
news-item caught my eye.
In a
story
datelined
December 18, 20 and titled, “Don't
use terrorists for quake relief: US to Pak”, PTI reported that7:
“The
United
States
has expressed grave concern over the involvement of militant outfits in
quake-relief operations in Pak-occupied
Kashmir
(PoK)…
Expressing concern over the involvement of 'banned groups' in the
relief operations, US envoy to Islamabad Ryan C Crocker
has said it should be a matter of concern for the Pakistan government that
groups involved in violence were associated with relief activities.”
So this
is now as “official” as can be – unfortunately, this does not
appear to have changed anything.
Even as
the US Ambassador was saying that he did not see any role for these groups
in the relief activities, the DG of ISI made the bland comment that, “their
(Islamic organisations) activities are being monitored but there is no bar
on their activities as long as they serve a humanitarian purpose".
Unbelievable!
The amounts involved in all this effort are staggering.
Some reports suggest that the total tally may cross $ 5 billion. The
pledges in the immediate aftermath of the earthquake itself were in
several hundreds of $ millions (including pledges of ~
$350 million from Saudi
Arabia and the Gulf states)
In a
story datelined 19th November ’05, BBC reported
Pakistan’s PM as saying that8, “The
rough total we have as of now is $5.4bn”.
The story went on to mention that “The figure exceeds the $5.2bn
Pakistan had been
asking for” and
that “The Muslim states of
Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE
and Turkey were the largest donors”
Even if
one (cynically) assumes that the actual aid on the ground will only be 20%
of the total, we are talking sums in excess of $1 billion – the bulk of
which will be funnelled through Jehadi channels who will no doubt take
their cut. Even if you were to further assume that the amount appropriated
by these channels (or their “cut”) would “only” be 10% of the aid on the
ground, we are talking of funds to the tune of $100m.
To put
this in perspective, “…the
CIA has estimated,
for example, that it cost Al Qaeda’ some $30 million a year to sustain
itself during the period preceding 9/11”
(this fascinating report9 also describes the role of Islamic
charities in supporting Al-Qaeda)
If
nothing else, these amounts would ensure that the Lashkar will continue to
operate on its own for at least several years (possibly a decade). There
is also the possibility that the Lashkar will “inflate” its looses to
attract more funding from the Islamic charities and the Gulf states. I
need not even mention that most of these “Islamic Charities” operate well
beyond the pale of any international oversight or accountability.
Worse,
the “new” terrorist camps that will no doubt come up to replace the ones
in Muzzafarabad and Balakot will in all likelihood be earthquake-proof and
therefore more likely to withstand any air-strikes.
I find it
hard to explain the almost
complete lack of sensitivity (and
apathy) amongst the general public towards the fact that many terrorist
groups are based in this region and that earthquake aid could very easily
end up as arms for these groups.
One recalls the
storm kicked up by the “secular” media about the earthquake aid disbursed
in
Gujarat
and its effect on "extremist Hindu groups" in 2001.
Such a discussion is conspicuously missing even as millions of dollars are
going to an area infested with Islamic terrorists.
Is it not
time to make the wider world aware of this?
B Shantanu
Send your views to author
References:
-
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1259120,curpg-1,fright-0,right-0.cms
-
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,387995,00.html
-
http://www.himalmag.com/2004/february/essay.htm
-
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/18/international/asia/18kashmir.html
-
http://www.time.com/time/asia/covers/501051024/story.html
-
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/15/AR2005101501392_pf.html
-
http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=60132# compstory
-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4451514.stm
-
http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2005/Jan/comrasJan05.asp
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or weblisting page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |