|
|
By: Moorthy Muthuswamy PhD
December 23, 2005
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
(The writer is an US-based nuclear physicist. He can be reached at
moorthym@comcast.net)
India inherited its democratic system from the departing British in 1947
who ruled it for several hundred years.
It is far
from clear whether India had a mature and able class of
Indigenous people who
could formulate a robust and consistent constitution. It now appears that Article 30 of
Indian Constitution not only violates the secular character of India, but
also promotes religious discrimination of majority and may be in violation
of Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Adopted and proclaimed by
United Nations General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December
1948.
Majority Hindus are a disadvantaged community
Article 30 of Indian constitution has certain provisions whereby
minorities are exempt (are allowed to discriminate on the basis of
religion, unlike majority) from certain requirements in running their own
institutions (http://www.legalservicesindia.com/articles/judi.htm).
By and large, Hindus are not considered minority (even in areas where they
are a numerical minority such as Jammu and Kashmir) but Christians and
Muslims definitely are. For instance, according to Article 30, minority
community may reserve up to 50 percent of the seats for the members of its
own community in an educational institution established and administered
by it even if the institution is getting aid from the State.
Christian and Muslim-controlled educational institutions in India,
encouraged by Article 30 of Indian constitution, are found to discriminate
heavily in favor of their religious compatriots in employment and in
student admissions (Religious apartheid in India and American policy
response).
But Christians and Muslims are not disadvantaged community in India.
Indian Christian community has among the highest literacy rates (53% Hindu
literacy rate vs. 81% Christian literacy rate; literacy also implies
wealth) and Indian Muslims already have a 25% permanent reservation of
land, wealth and opportunities called Pakistan/Bangladesh – almost emptied
of Hindus due to massive ethnic cleansing and religious discrimination
(and driven away to India). Christian community was favored by British
colonizers until sixty years ago.
Therefore, unlike America where blacks, discriminated for centuries, who
are now given employment preferences in the form of affirmative action,
there is little justification for minority reservations in India.
Indeed, Islamic Partitioning of India in 1947 has already made Hindus the
disadvantaged community in India and these minority reservations for
proselytizing religions such as Christianity or Islam create conditions of
majority Hindu religious genocide – by making the majority poor by
unfairly excluding them from employment and education.
This situation has already been created in Kerala where minorities have
taken advantage of Article 30 to exclude majority Hindus from education
and employment and driven them to poverty. This was pointed by Prof. Issac
(http://www.saveindia.com/for_hindus_in_kerala_it.htm).
The jihadi movement in Kashmir is strengthened by reservations in favor of
Muslims (http://www.saveindia.com/perfect_con_job.htm,
http://www.saveindia.com/woes_of_jammu_and_ladakh.htm,
http://www.saveindia.com/india-colony.htm).
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Article 23 of the Universal Declaration: “Everyone has the right to work,
to free choice of employment to just and favorable conditions of work and
to protection against unemployment”. The already disadvantaged majority
Hindus being unfairly denied the right to work in religious
minority-controlled institutions in India because of their religious
affiliation should also be considered in violation of the above
Declaration.
Article 26 of the Universal Declaration: “Everyone has the right to
education…Technical and professional education shall be made generally
available and higher education shall be made equally accessible to all on
the basis of merit”. Religious minority-controlled institutions in India
give preferential admission to students of their faith that again is
sanctioned by Article 30 of Indian constitution. This again unfairly
denies already disadvantaged majority Hindu students access to education
on the basis of merit.
The recent assertion by Indian HRD minister Arjun Singh defining
Article 30 of Indian constitution as “protecting minorities” is
inappropriate. An appropriate interpretation of Article 30 is one of
giving unfair preferences to Indian minorities but also of promoting
majority apartheid and discrimination. Such an Indian state can arguably,
seen as an uncivilized one (through its violation of Universal Declaration
of Human Rights), despite calling itself as a “secular democracy”. A
detailed analysis shows that through constitutional based religious
discrimination of majority, the Indian state may be embarking on a
collective suicide of itself and its majority population – unless Article
30 is amended to make it free of religious discrimination.
Moorthy Muthuswamy PhD
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or weblisting page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |
Previous
by:
Moorthy Muthuswamy PhD
Blueprint for tackling jihad in India
Novermber 20, 2005
Activism: Follow-up to USCIRF
October 26, 2005
Activism: Follow-up to USSD
October 25, 2005
Internet Civilization
September 21, 2005
Apartheid in India: Letter to Condi Rice
August 30, 2004
Igniting Hindu fight back
June 19, 2005
Discrimination by Indian minorities
May 08, 2005
Is Sikhism destined for dustbin of history?
April 13, 2005
USA undermining religious freedom?
April 06, 2005
Inside story of Modi’s visa revoke
March 20, 2005
A Hindu Movement Born February
28, 2005
Muslim Reservation = Jihad
December 20, 2004
How were Srilankan Hindus
United? December 08,
2004
Time to Revamp Indian
Democracy? November 15,
2004
Dynamics of Proselytizing September
26, 2004
How can India Defeat Militant
Islam?
August 30, 2004
The Art of War on Terror
August 12, 2004
What are India’s national
security interests? June 08, 2004
Congress-led coalition: a
stooge of Islamists? May 19, 2004
Citizens’ role in India’s war
on terror
May 14, 2004
Mandate for Indo-Pak peace
settlement
April 18, 2004
When are India and Pakistan
ready for peace? March 21, 2004
American Policy Advice in
South Asia: Fatal Flaws February 02,
2004
Prithiviraj, Again?
January 21, 2004
India’s Future: Trend should
be a Friend
January 18, 2004
Soft Borders with Pakistan: A
Certain Suicide
January 01, 2004
A New Paradigm: Civilization
through Wealth Creation
December 28, 2003
Slaves, Servants & Rulers
October 16, 2003
|