|
|
By: V Sundaram
Novermber 11, 2005
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
(The writer is a retired IAS Officer)
Both the Congress and the BJP, by themselves are in minority in the Lok
Sabha. The great question before the country today is whether
parliamentary rights can be effectively enjoyed by the BJP minority
particularly when the party opposite, namely the shameless Indian National
Congress Party, at the cost of all reputation, character and dignity, are
resolved to cling to office in a rickety UPA coalition-Government and
drain the last dregs of that ill-gotten cup. Every citizen in India is
asking the question: “Is this UPA Government above Party Government or
below Party Government?” That is determined and settled by Sonia Gandhi.
It is this operational confusion at the highest level that has made the
External Affairs Minister, K Natwar Singh, come out with an amazingly
ignominious statement: “As foreign Minister, I have spoken to our
Permanent Representative to United Nations half a dozen times (since the
Volcker Committee Report was made public). I have asked him… please get an
appointment with the Secretary General, to have an appointment with Paul
Volcker and find out the truth and let us know… If there is anything wrong
that we have done, we would like to correct it. If we have not done so,
then we should convey our displeasure”. This very shaky reaction by Natwar
Singh clearly shows that he is oscillating and vacillating between the two
extreme spheres of unavoidable silence and unmentionable shame. His
statement almost reminds me of a last minute desperate SOS sent by the
Captain of a sinking ship, soon after it was torpedoed by an enemy
submarine.
The Congress Party and Natwar Singh have been named by the Volcker
Committee as non-contractual beneficiaries under the oil-for-food
programme in Iraq. The point to be noted is that this relates to a period
when Congress Party was in the opposition and Natwar Singh had no official
position in the Government of India. This is an indisputable fact which
neither Congress Party (with or without the help of its Leftist partners)
nor can Natwar Singh question today.
This being the case, I am unable to understand how K. Natwar Singh can
direct Nirupam Sen, India’s permanent representative to United Nations, to
seek an appointment with Kofi Annan or Volcker to verify the truth
relating to a sordid commercial drama, in which the Congress Party and
Natwar Singh are alleged to be indirectly involved. For the alleged
political misdeeds of Congress Party in opposition and alleged private
misdeeds of Natwar Singh when he was in no way connected with Government
of India, Nirupam Sen, who is the official representative of more than
thousand eight million people of India today, cannot be asked to function
as ‘their’ representative and verify the truth or otherwise of the
findings in the Volcker Committee Report.
The fact of the matter is that the Volcker Committee has in no way
indicted the Government of India in its report. One point is therefore
very clear. As a representative of Government of India today in the United
Nations, Nirupam Sen has no official responsibility to provide an air-raid
shelter to the Congress Party in general and Natwar Singh in particular
against the splinter attacks from opposition parties flowing from the
publication of the Volcker Committee Report. This seems to be the
wide-spread public perception today.
As a former Civil Servant, of no significance whatsoever, I am also
concerned about another problem which can perhaps affect the honour of
every Indian citizen. I am thinking of a possibility that when Nirupam Sen
meets Kofi Annan and Paul Volcker, there is every likelihood of their
putting a difficult and unanswerable question to Nirupam Sen: “Are you
seeking a clarification on behalf of the Government of India or are you
representing Sonia Gandhi as Congress President and Natwar Singh in his
private capacity? ”
It is in this context that Government of India will be performing a
supreme public duty in formally requesting Nirupam Sen or any other
responsible civil servant to ascertain and verify the facts relating to
the questionable transaction precisely on account of the fact that Natwar
Singh happens to be the External Affairs Minister of India today. The
nation can ill afford to have an indicted Cabinet Minister in the Ministry
of External Affairs. Unfortunately there is a lot of confusion in the
pubic mind arising out of the want of clear and categorical response from
the Government of India on the sensitive aspect of this issue.
Honesty of purpose should normally prompt frankness of statement. Fraud
includes the pretence of overriding knowledge when knowledge there is
none. As far as I can see, the traditional badges of fraud are liberally
spread over the Oil For Food transaction in prodigal profusion. The way in
which Natwar Singh and many other ministers in the UPA Government have
been rattled by the Volcker Committee Report brings to my mind the
following observations of Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes:
“It is a question of how strong an infusion of fraud is necessary to
turn a flavour into a poison”.
Tail piece:
The message of the Congress Party (Natwar Singh Not excluded), and the
constituents of the UPA Government to the nation today is: “We are small
men dedicated to the great and noble cause of OURSELVES and because our
cause is great and because our cause is noble, something of that
greatness, something of that nobility, falls on us also and blesses us and
above all our families--now and forever. Amen!”
V Sundaram
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or weblisting page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |
Previous
by:
V Sundaram
Field marshal for Sanathana Dharma
September 22, 2005
A land of elusive evaders?
September 04, 2005
Introducing equality where it is fatal
September 01, 2005
Dandi March and 15th August 2005
August 21, 2005
The fury of Congress fundamentalism-III
August 08, 2005
The fury of Congress fundamentalism- II
July 25, 2005
The fury of Congress
fundamentalism - I
July 24, 2005
India that is Bharath
July 14, 2005
Bharatiya JINNAH Party
June 26, 2005
The quintessence of Hindutva
May 24, 2005
Autocracy in science education
May 24, 2005
Jaya and Ramadoss!
April 23, 2005
Admn Reforms Comm: Welcome move
April 18, 2005
USA: With good will towards none
March 27, 2005
Public Impeachment of Indian Nabobs
March 17, 2005
The tragedy of Indian
democracy March
03, 2005
The Dancing Dervish of Goa February
08, 2005
Benny Hinn - Symbol of Secular
Adharma
January 29, 2005
Beware of Nocturnal Raids
January 14, 2005
Was Veer Savarkar ever a
Freedom Fighter?
December 24, 2004
Our National Degradation
December 13, 2004 |