|
|
By: Ron Banerjee
October 10, 2005
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
(Ron Banerjee is a graduate of Dalhousie University in Canada, and has
been employed as a telecommunications consultant for Fortune 500
companies. As a co-founder and Director of the non-profit Hindu Conference
of Canada (www.hccanada.com), his
mandate is to engage political leadership and media publications to foster
a positive image of Hindu interests and correct misperceptions about
Hinduism. He can be contacted at info@hccanada.com.)
In 1994, an outbreak of plague struck Gujurat. Its scale was tiny, but the
Western media reacted with hysteria. Ever eager to debase India, a
journalist discovered a remote village where the inhabitants fed rats in
the local temple. Pictures of these rats soon found their way into
newspapers, and rumors spread that plague was being spread by Hindu
`rat-worshippers`. Thus, an obscure practice in an insignificant corner
was used to convey contempt and bigotry about a nation and civilization to
millions of viewers globally.
Enormous resources are devoted to spreading lies and perpetuating negative
stereotypes about Hindus. Missionaries like Pat Robertson, and Islamic
fundamentalists have a vested interest in destroying the self-esteem of
Hindus, and they enjoy great success. Much of their success is due to
self-hating Hindus who collaborate with foreign interests and advance
their cause. Our media and entertainment industries are dominated by these
entities, and it is not difficult to see why negative influences abound in
this fetid environment. `Bollywood` is awash with Middle Eastern money and
mafia interests, and many `producers` and `directors` of films and plays
are bought and paid for by those whose primary motivation is to destroy
India.
Deepa Mehta has recently been feted and elevated by Western film
aficionados, with star status conferred at the Toronto International Film
Festival. The media, both Western and Indian, have bestowed breathless
adulation and rave reviews. It is hard to see why. In Fire, she projects
the idea that Hindu traditions of abstinence drive neglected housewives
into lesbian relationships. In her new film Water, she links sexual
exploitation of widows to the ancient Hindu traditions of abstinence
involving widows. Both films delve into bizarre, obscure, and virtually
non-existent practices in India. Much like the mythical `rat-worshipping
Hindus`, the practices depicted have little basis in reality and are
specifically designed to project a false and derogatory image of Hindu
culture.
Deepa Mehta has embraced her role with gusto. Recently, the AIDS Committee
of Toronto outraged the entire Hindu community by putting on a fashion
show featuring scantily clad transsexuals dressed as Hindu deities. To
their credit, the AIDS Committee issued an apology on their website (as
well as an apology addressed to our organization) when challenged on their
indiscretion by a broad range of Hindu groups. These groups included the
Alliance for South Asian AIDS Prevention, Hindu Conference of Canada, and
Vishnu Mandir. The lone dissenting voice was Deepa Mehta, who publicly
stated that she did not see anything offensive about the show.
Clearly, Ms Mehta is a self-appointed conveyor of anti Hindu hatred. Her
paymasters are the Western film festivals, ‘artistic community’, and media
entities who transform a person with little talent and feverishly
perverted imagination into a celebrity of substance.
We understand the motivations of foreign entities to project as negative
an image of Hinduism as possible: we have seen this in the 1994 ‘plague
scare’, we have seen it when Pat Robertson and other missionaries call
Hinduism ‘demonic’, and we have experienced it throughout history. What is
astounding is the slavish adulation of Deepa Mehta by the Indian press and
Hindus who ought to know better. It seems that all it takes for us to
worship someone who acts against our interests is for foreign pundits to
bless and confer legitimacy on this person. We must develop the ability to
critically analyze the motivations of foreigners, and make informed
judgments as to whether or not films and news reports financed or produced
by their minions are biased or realistic.
Ron Banerjee
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or weblisting page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |
Previous
by:
Ron Banerjee
---- |