|
|
By: Moorthy Muthuswamy PhD
September 21, 2005
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
(The writer is a nuclear physicist based in America. He is also a
director of Indian American Intellectuals Forum, a New York-based
non-profit organization. His contact address: MoorthyM@comcast.net)
Many sociologists and internet pioneers have begun to realize -- societies
for the first time across continents and on large scale are becoming part
of a new civilization -- an Internet Civilization. Will America continue
to its science and technology dominance in this era or will it be upstaged
by a resurging China or any other nation? These questions are not merely
academic as security, wealth or even global order will be determined
depending on an answer. I argue here that current trends and outlook
indicate an upstaged America if certain policy decisions are not taken now
to strongly promote science education in America.
Merriam-Webster on-line dictionary defines civilization as “a relatively
high level of cultural and technological development”. Implicit in this
definition is the critical role of scientific knowledge driving technology
development. Even if one were to use the term “progress” or “development”,
it becomes apparent that this is first achieved by understanding nature
and then manipulating it to suit our needs.
Internet has brought unprecedented level of access to wide ranging and
up-to-date information. This information was previously accessible mostly
to exclusive domains -- through print media. Of course, Internet impact is
far more than that – the level of access and connectivity have led to
forming communities and commerce that transcend physical boundaries! Is
there any correlation between increased information access and progress?
Let me first address the issue of which institutions had limited
information access in the recent past. Organized religious institutions
have relied on “revelations” given to “God’s messengers” several hundred
to thousand years ago to indoctrinate masses, and to limit the masses’
information access in order to keep their powerbase and control. A case in
point: The dismal scientific output of Islamic societies correlates with
Islamic clerics’ iron control over their societies – mostly restricted to
a narrow interpretation of a certain “God’s revelations” -- at least a
thousand year old. A study of past several hundred year history shows a
direct correlation between civilization advancement, and diverse opinions
and ideas available through various types of media. These diverse opinions
limited the influence of organized religions’ directives on how masses
should live. Hence this encouraged people to investigate, develop ideas
and manipulate nature to achieve progress.
In this era real wealth, national confidence or even security comes down
to creating and owning Intellectual Property in the form of patents. In
1950s America generated over 70% Intellectual Property worldwide. Now its
share has reduced to about 55%. Even as Internet opens up America to
achieve the next level of progress the grip of religious theology can be a
retarding force. A survey released by Rasmussen Reports in April 2005,
found most Americans – 63 percent – believe the Bible is literally true
and the Word of God -- just 24 percent thinking otherwise.
In my mind this statistics bare open the weakness of American society to
new knowledge and ideas in this era. It also shows a lack of American
appreciation of scientific knowledge in building modern civilizations.
Such a civilization doesn’t attract enough bright students to specialize
in science and technology. Indeed -- at least 30-40% of graduate students
in American science or engineering graduate programs are of foreign
origins.
All of this contrasts with China or even India where younger generation
has realized lucrative career paths through learning science and
technology. Importantly, the majority in these countries are not dominated
by an outlook that puts emphasis on book(s) of “God’s revelations” to help
guide them. In the era of information-based Internet Civilization, this is
a significant advantage over an America that is clearly
theology-influenced. America was able to out-compete and bankrupt the
atheist former Soviet Union because unlike America or even China Soviet
Union never focused on wealth creation for its citizens.
Instead of going in the direction of less religious theology and more
science, now American schools are in danger of offering “alternate” ideas
on evolution based upon theology. The proponents of “Intelligent Design”
on the development of human race have not understood that this theory was
formulated and handed down by civilizations that had far less
understanding of nature than what we have today. Admittedly, modern
science does not have a complete or some say a satisfactory answer to the
question of human evolution. But the modern science is based on a solid
footing; it is the basis of the civilization we live today. Besides, we
continue to improve our understanding of nature.
How credible is the theological understanding of nature? It is
well-established that building an extensive understanding (“theory”) of
nature requires sophisticated experimental verification that in turn
requires highly complex infrastructure – like we have in the modern times.
We know from archeological studies that medieval civilizations that
existed thousands of years ago had far less sophisticated infrastructure.
Hence, there exists little basis that medieval civilizations could have
come up with a credible all-encompassing "theory of origin" and governance
called religion when they had a very primitive, mostly shown to be false,
understanding of nature around them. Given their state of ignorance it is
highly unlikely that they could really appreciate any of "God’s
revelations" or distinguish the "real" ones. Also even if “God’s
revelations” had been made it is an open question how accurately these
were taken down, preserved and converted in the form of books or any other
form of information storage -- when we know from archeological studies
that as early as a thousand years ago humans lacked credible technology
for processing and storing information.
Finally, archeology tells us that evolving humans had thrived for hundreds
of thousands of years, well before “God’s revelations” arrived to “guide”
humans within the past several thousand years. Thriving are other forms of
living organisms that do not appear to follow any theology!
Emphasis on science and technology over religious ideologies is also a
win-win war-on-terror strategy. As discussed previously, it has become
apparent that religious clerics have suffocated Muslim communities from
embracing new ideas – a must for development. In addition, these deprived
communities have been brain-washed by clerics into looking for scapegoats
in the form of non-Muslim “non-believers (-- of Muslim theology)” and to
extend the frontiers of Islamic theological control – at the expense of
non-believers.
The current religious and social dynamics in America are such that America
is unlikely to put strong emphasis on scientific education – as it did
when Soviets put man for the first time on space. Given its size and the
track record of wealth creation during the past twenty years, China is
likely to emerge as the most powerful nation in the new era of Internet
Civilization.
What about India? A bright future holds for India only if it can break
away from the
shackles imposed by militant Islam (How
can India Defeat Militant Islam?) and if it works to shield its
population from America-based evangelical soul harvesters, trying to sell
a retrogressive and outdated religious theology to poor and unsuspecting
Indians.
Moorthy Muthuswamy PhD
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or weblisting page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |
Previous
by:
Moorthy Muthuswamy PhD
Apartheid in India: Letter to Condi Rice
August 30, 2004
Igniting Hindu fight back
June 19, 2005
Discrimination by Indian minorities
May 08, 2005
Is Sikhism destined for dustbin of history?
April 13, 2005
USA undermining religious freedom?
April 06, 2005
Inside story of Modi’s visa revoke
March 20, 2005
A Hindu Movement Born February
28, 2005
Muslim Reservation = Jihad
December 20, 2004
How were Srilankan Hindus
United? December 08,
2004
Time to Revamp Indian
Democracy? November 15,
2004
Dynamics of Proselytizing September
26, 2004
How can India Defeat Militant
Islam?
August 30, 2004
The Art of War on Terror
August 12, 2004
What are India’s national
security interests? June 08, 2004
Congress-led coalition: a
stooge of Islamists? May 19, 2004
Citizens’ role in India’s war
on terror
May 14, 2004
Mandate for Indo-Pak peace
settlement
April 18, 2004
When are India and Pakistan
ready for peace? March 21, 2004
American Policy Advice in
South Asia: Fatal Flaws February 02,
2004
Prithiviraj, Again?
January 21, 2004
India’s Future: Trend should
be a Friend
January 18, 2004
Soft Borders with Pakistan: A
Certain Suicide
January 01, 2004
A New Paradigm: Civilization
through Wealth Creation
December 28, 2003
Slaves, Servants & Rulers
October 16, 2003
|