|
|
By:
Alka
and Raghbendra Jha
September 02, 2005
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
Related articles:
Indian History, Destruction of Hinduism and the Truth about Marxists
Nithin Sridhar
CPI(M) and Karl Marx
Dr.Dipak Basu
ASI and planned death of history
V Sundaram
"Ramakrishna deranged”....Reject this History
Raghbendra Jha
Is Sikhism destined for dustbin of history?
Moorthy Muthuswamy
Mr. Singh, Don?t Play With The History
Shachi Rairikar
Book review: Marxism & Indian History
Shankar Sharan
India?s Vedic History / Holocaust Museum
Abhijit Bagal
Letter to Washington Post on Indian History
Vivek Bakshi
"Rescuing India"s Hijacked History"
Vivek Bakshi
History of VANDE MATARAM Sadhu
Prof. V. RangarajanOn the 22nd August 2005 it was revealed in the Rajya Sabha that in one of
the history text books in India the great saint Ramakrishna Paramhansa had
been called "mentally deranged." It was reported that this reference had
later been deleted. What is really sad (but not surprising) is how Indians
have come to let things come to such a pass that one of the most towering
figures in Indian history can be so nonchalantly slighted.
It is instructive to contrast the reference to this great saint during the
predecessor of the Houses of Indian Parliament – discussions on the
Constituent Assembly. Speaking during the Constituent Assembly
Deliberations on Saturday, 19th November 1949: Shri H. V. Kamath: (C.P. &
Berar: General) said “...Sir, the people of India have come to the end of
a long journey which is, however, the beginning of a longer, a more
arduous and a more hazardous one. Through several decades of struggle we
have reached the goal of freedom. During those decades we passed through
many vicissitudes of fortune and were guided by leaders many of whom are
not among us today. True to the Indian genius our struggle, our awakening,
began with a spiritual renaissance which was pioneered by Ramakrishna
Paramahansa, Swami Vivekananda and Swami Dayananda. ...”
It is indeed God`s grace and blessing on India that He gave her a son like
Ramakrishna Paramhansa. Even in a country with a long tradition of saints
and towering spiritual masters Swami Ramakrishna Paramahansa stands out as
a great practitioner, indeed embodiment, of the highest traditions of
Sanatana Dharma. It is also well known that, like all great exponents of
Sanatana Dharma, he had great and genuine respect (not just tolerance) for
other religions. He showed it by actually practising religions other than
Hinduism and then claiming the unity of all faiths. His whole life was
literally an uninterrupted contemplation of God. He reached a depth of
God-consciousness that transcends all time and place and has a universal
appeal. His message was his God-consciousness. When God-consciousness
falls short, traditions become dogmatic and oppressive and religious
teachings lose their transforming power. At a time when the very
foundation of religion, faith in God, was crumbling under the relentless
blows of materialism and skepticism, Sri Ramakrishna, through his burning
spiritual realizations, demonstrated beyond doubt the reality of God and
the validity of the time-honoured teachings of all the prophets and
saviors of the past, and thus restored the falling edifice of religion on
a secure foundation.
Drawn by the magnetism of Sri Ramakrishna`s divine personality, people
flocked to him from far and near - men and women, young and old,
philosophers and theologians, philanthropists and humanists, atheists and
agnostics, Hindus and Brahmos, and even some Christians and Muslims,
seekers of truth of all races, creeds and castes. A great contribution of
Sri Ramakrishna to the modern world is his message of the harmony of
religions. To Sri Ramakrishna all religions are the revelation of God in
His diverse aspects to satisfy the manifold demands of human minds and are
not contradictory but complementary. Sri Ramakrishna faithfully practiced
the spiritual disciplines of different religions and came to the
realization that all of them lead to the same goal. Thus he declared, "As
many faiths, so many paths." The paths vary, but the goal remains the
same. Harmony of religions is not uniformity; it is unity in diversity. It
is not a fusion of religions, but a fellowship of religions based on their
common goal - communion with God. This great master himself was so
submerged in God consciousness that he could not discriminate between
human and non-human existence, let alone among human beings. To quote him:
"I began to perceive God in all beings. Formal worship dropped away. You
see that bel tree. I used to go there to pluck its leaves. One day, as I
plucked a leaf, a bit of the bark came off. I found the tree full of
consciousness. I felt grieved because I had hurt the tree. One day I tried
to pluck some darva grass, but I found I couldn`t do it very well. One day
I was about to gather some flowers…they were everywhere on the trees. At
once I had a vision of [God]; it appeared that His worship was just over.
The flowers looked like a bouquet placed on the head of the deity. I could
not pluck them."
This is the highest stage of human consciousness – that of advaita - when
one sees the divine spirit manifested in all living things. It should be
noted, however, that the Paramhansa transcended caste distinctions most
vigorously even as a child. During his yagyopavit he insisted that his
Bhiksha Maa (mother giving alms) be a washerwoman to whom he was very
attached. He got his way – even in those days when caste oppression was so
severe. Furthermore, he produced a great disciple such as Swami
Vivekananda who castigated Hindus for forgetting the true spirit of
Vedanta and confining their religion to “pots and pans and the kitchen”.
Readers would know how tirelessly Swami Vivekananda fought against caste
oppression.
Who, among modern religious icons anywhere in the world, can surpass the
magnanimity of Ramakrishna Paramhans? If someone of even half the caliber
of Ramakrishna Paramahansa had been born in Western society they would
have been revered. Whatever the official history writers of India might
think, the ordinary people of India revere him and will continue to revere
– nay have immense devotion for him. Such is the soul of India.
This instance of slighting the Paramhansa, most unfortunate as it is, is
also symptomatic of a certain tendency in India to be loose with history
especially when it comes to matters that relate to Sanatana Dharma. These
tendencies are no doubt encouraged and nurtured by several Indian
historians. It has not been even 150 years since the passing away of Swami
Ramakrishna and his history is being distorted. One can imagine what these
historians are doing with ancient Indian history.
Thus there is no dearth of wild judgments like caste discrimination is
condoned by the Vedas, that the Vedas write of the consumption of beef and
so on. Such statements are pertinent to every Hindu since the Vedas are
the foundation of Santana Dharma. These so-called historians know that
very few people will take the trouble of actually reading the Vedas and
checking the veracity of their claims. Their judgment is not entirely
unfounded since traditionally very few people have indeed checked out
these claims and, indeed, the Vedas are extremely subtle. However, this is
changing and a growing number of Hindus are taking interest in the true
form of their scriptures and religious practices.
I have ventured into this area and have read the Rig Veda and the
Yajurveda with a view to understanding the social context of the Vedic
period. Far from condoning the eating of beef the Vedas treat the cow as
being worthy of worship and protection at all times. In the 10,552 slokas
of the biggest Veda - the Rig Veda - there is not one sloka that condones
beef eating. The same is true of the 1,975 slokas of the Yajurveda. I have
not completed my reading of the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda but I am
confident that on this matter, as well as for any other matter of
significance, there is no contradiction among the Vedas. Forget about
harming cows (which are actually deemed worthy of worship) the Vedas frown
upon violence on any innocent animal. The principal reason the cow is
regarded as being holy is that cow’s milk is a good substitute for
mother’s milk for an infant. Thus one should be grateful to the cow.
Expressing gratitude is very important for the Vedas – they do that for a
number of environmental resources such as trees, rivers and clean air as
well. I am writing below the translation of just one sloka from the Rig
Veda extolling the virtues of the cow.
“O mother cow you are never to be killed. May you eat good quality grass
and have good fortune. May we all attain good fortune with you. May you
eat pure grass, drink pure water and be able to move freely.”…..Rigveda
Samhita, Part 1, sukta 164, sloka 1742. There are many such slokas.
Similarly there is no mention anywhere in the Vedas about condoning
discrimination based on caste. Despite claims to the contrary by modern
historians the Vedas talk of the equality of and fraternal love between
all castes. Thus we have
“People of all five varnas (Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaisya, Sudra and Nishaad)
living together with fraternal love and desiring to perform yagnas adorn
through prayers, Somadeva, who nourishes everyone.” …Rigveda Samhita Part
4, Sukta 14, sloka 7815
Thus the castes should live together, treat each other with fraternal love
and all castes are entitled to perform yagnas. Nowhere in the Vedas can
one find any passage condoning cow slaughter or caste discrimination.
However, caste discrimination exists in India and it has now badly
fractured the body polity. This is the result of the decay of Hindu
society through internal fissures brought about partly as a result of
centuries of foreign oppression. The foundation of the religion itself is,
however, pristine – indeed it can be seen to be an acme of human
civilizational attainment.
Similar statements can be made for other forms of discrimination (e.g. on
the basis of gender) allegedly sanctified by the Vedas. The Vedas are
replete with slokas in praise of women and giving them substantial rights.
In fact women in India have de facto lost much of their rights that were
sanctioned in the Vedas, although they may have such rights on paper. I
plan to write about this in a subsequent article.
Reverting now to the historians who slighted Paramhansa one can ask what
kind of historians are these who consciously try to distort history. They
construe their imagination to be history and mislead the people. If
someone tried to distort the history of any Western society many voices
would be raised in protest. But these Indian historians know very well
that instead of facing opposition hardly anyone will oppose their views.
This is really very sad. Not only are such distorted views creating false
picture of history in the minds of Indian students but also painting a
false and demeaning picture of India in the minds of foreigners with a
genuine interest in the history of India. When proof of their
misconception is presented to them, these foreigners are taken aback. Many
of them change their views but how far can such efforts succeed when
so-called “major” historians of India present such distorted views? It is
high time that genuine historians of India - without a political axe to
grind - are given the prominence they deserve and these so called
historians exposed for what they really are.
The great rishis who composed the Vedas were prescient and probably
anticipated that, in time to come, the message of Sanatana Dharma would be
grossly distorted. For instance, the Rig Veda in talking of Sanatana
Dharma says: “This path is sanatana (timeless). All gods and human beings
have been born along it and have achieved progress. O humans! Please do
not destroy this mother of yours, the basis of your genesis.”….Rigveda
Samhita, Part 2, Manda 4, Sukta 18, sloka 3259.
It is too much to expect these historians to accept such advice. However
the people of India – indeed the world – would do well to reject this
history. They do not have to look beyond the Vedas to put into effect a
cultural renaissance that will not only create a just and peaceful society
but also equip us with the wherewithal to come to terms with the social
and cultural consequences of globalization.
Alka Shekhar Jha and Raghbendra Jha
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or weblisting page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |
Previous
by:
Alka and Raghbendra Jha
Swami Ranganathananda ? A Tribute
April 30, 2005
The Pro-Poor UPA Government?
March 28, 2005
Hindus need to rediscover their values
February
21, 2005
|