By: Moorthy Muthuswamy PhD
June 19, 2005
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
(The views expressed
here are author’s own. The writer is a nuclear physicist based in America.
He is also a director of Indian American Intellectuals Forum, a New
York-based non-profit organization. His contact address:
Now Assam, after
is now clear that
is going very much in the direction of Kashmir – emergence of a
full-fledged Muslim sponsored insurgency brought on by migration of
Muslims from Bangladesh.
nutshell, this is again about extending Islamic frontiers further into
India at the expense of “infidel” Indians. Before this development came
massive ethnic cleansing of non-Muslims – Hindus and Sikhs in particular
from Pakistan, followed by Hindus from Bangladesh and then most recently
from Indian “controlled” Kashmir.
It should come as no surprise that
Pakistan and Bangladesh have masterminded migration of Bangladeshi Muslims into
India. But it
is Indian Muslim community and in particular its leadership that is among
the biggest sponsors of this infiltration. After all, it is in the
self-interest of Indian Muslims – to convert
India into an
In a very
recent speech, Maulana Syed Asad Madani, the national President of the
Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, at a massive rally by the organization's Assam unit
at Guwahati demanded
permanent land settlement
and citizenship certificates to Muslims (illegal from Bangladesh) living
in the state’s “char area” (river islands). He also demanded reservation
for Muslims in state government jobs and in police force. He gave the
Congress government in Assam elected through Muslim vote-bank six-month
deadline to fulfill these “grievances”.
is demanding reservation for Muslims (at a gathering attended by Congress
President Sonia Gandhi) in all sectors and in all of India! A research
conducted by Abu Saale Sharif, based on the National Sample Survey in 1998
points out literary rates of 52.5%, 49.5% and 81% for Hindus, Muslims and
Christians respectively. The very high Christian literacy rates are due to
Indian Christian community’s control of many educational institutions and
practicing religious discrimination in favor of Christians. Indian Muslim
institutions too tend to do the same (Religious
discrimination by Indian minorities).
Madani is a leader of Indian Muslims with a huge following. These demands
are nothing but war by other means – to perpetuate ever more increasing
migration of Muslims from Bangladesh, while at the same time take away
land and resources (through reservation) and wealth from native Hindus so
that they become impoverished and set the stage for islamization of Assam
and the rest of India.
Why regimes in power are unable to act
few people have understood why Indian regimes in power are unable to act
decisively against Islamic fascism. It is critical in identifying the root
cause in order to develop strategies to remedy the situation. Whether it
was “secular” Congress-led government or nationalistic BJP-led government
the results have been remarkably similar. Making policy recommendations
and expecting the leadership to act is to live in fool’s paradise – given
the past sixty year history in India.
recently, even seven Chief Ministers belonging to non-BJP governments in
North-East voiced grave concerns to Congress-led UPA regime in New Delhi
about migration from Bangladesh.
Muslim clergy who represent Indian Muslim leadership command a large
following and are virtually exempt from the rule of law. The political
indoctrination that goes on in Friday prayers in just about all mosques in
India gives them a huge dictatorial and unmatched power over Indian Muslim
masses. These clerics continue to wage various forms of jihad (more later)
on the Indian state and its majority Hindu “infidels”.
Any attempt to enforce rule of law on a popular Muslim cleric leads to
massive, coordinated and uncontrolled violence on the State machinery,
properties and attacks on Hindu population, spearheaded by the mosques
belonging to the cleric and supported by other clerics around the country.
situation is virtually impossible for any Indian government to handle.
This is the reason why the regimes in power can’t act against Islamic
fascism. With majority religion weakly institutionalized, the government
thus far got a little in the way of organized support from them.
There is yet another reason: Islamic fascism is increasingly determining
what parties get to power and who holds the reigns, and what the media
chooses to publish or analyze.
instance, only politicians that are considered “secular” (as defined by
non-secular medieval Muslim clergy) can expect to hold reins of power.
Able politicians such as Narendra Modi who works to curtail jihadi power
are characterized as “communal” by Indian jihadis and their proxies in
politics and media (An
inside story of Modi’s visa revoke). These “secular” politicians, so
defined, are expected to be sympathetic to Muslim jihadi interests and
soft that they are also unlikely to use force on jihadi clerics to uphold
the rule of law. While the dethroned NDA regime had a soft and ineffective
Vajpayee as Prime Minister, now the Congress-led UPA regime has an inept
old bureaucrat as the PM. Having relied on Muslim vote back controlled by
Indian jihadis, upper echelons of Congress are staffed by jihadi appeasers
coalition: a stooge of Islamists?). These people tend to see
non-existing threats from organizations representing Hindus such as RSS,
VHP while continuing to appease and accommodate Islamic fascism. When
Indian Muslims already have 25% reservation ((Muslim
Reservation = Jihad), the congress-led regime is working overtime to
increase reservation unfairly for Indian Muslims – it just announced 50%
reservation for Muslims in PG courses at Aligarh Muslim University. All of
this will come at the expense of majority community and set the stage for
destruction of India in the hands of Islam, by making Hindus poor and
illiterate. It comes as no surprise that this regime is slated to pass
soon “Prevention of
to reign in on processions by Hindu organizations. This takes away a
major component Hindu ability to mobilize against Islamic fascism, while
Muslim clerics continue to mobilize and sponsor jihad through Indian
mosques and madarasas!
Muslim intimidation also extends to press and media. If any of them
publish material that adversely affect Muslim interests they are subjected
to extreme forms of violence with no one to protect them -- neither the
majority community nor the regimes in power, which too has been thoroughly
intimidated. This intimidation also means that editorial boards get
staffed by people who again are sympathetic to Muslim cause and who too
must pass the “secular” definition of Muslim clergy.
In essence society, media and the governments in India are under Islamic siege. I am going to discuss here proven ways
societies can break out of this type of a siege to vanquish the enemy. I
first set the stage by discussing forms of jihad.
Forms of jihad
areas where Muslims have power through majority status in South Asia, an
open warfare was imposed on non-Muslims, leading to most of them being
evicted from ancestral lands to India. This happened in Muslim majority
Pakistan, Bangladesh or India’s own Kashmir. Those who decided to stay
behind were constitutionally discriminated and harassed.
But in the rest of
Muslims are a minority they do not hold power. Hence they can only resort
to other forms of jihad to undermine the majority in every way and
increase Muslim population and power. Hence different yardstick of what
constitutes a jihad in
needed. An India with
increasingly poorer and illiterate majority Hindus shrinking in
population, and an increasing Muslim population that is wealthier is the
necessary requirement for destruction and eventual Islamization. Hence,
every effort is made by Muslim leadership in India to achieve it. An integrated Indian Muslim strategy relies on the
Ensure a high Muslim population growth rate
Census after census taken over the years shows exactly that. What is
notable is Muslim clergy’s active encouragement of Indian Muslims to have
larger families, even as Muslim clergy in many Muslim majority nations
discourage large families. This undermines Indian government’s efforts on
family planning for a resource-limited and over-populated India. As the
Muslim population increases so does its share of power.
Demand reservation for Indian Muslims in education & jobs
kind of Islam practiced in India is so much oriented toward jihad that
Indian Muslims in general perform poorly in modern education. Reservation
for Indian Muslims does two things: One it takes away education and job
opportunities from deserving Hindu majority, making them poor and
illiterate; two, it gives these opportunities to undeserving Muslims.
Clearly, these reservation policies do nothing to address the fundamental
deficiencies in Islam. Given the strong embrace of radicalism by Indian
Muslims, this will put radicals in position of power and wealth and
accelerate the process of India’ destruction. As noted before Indian
Muslims already have a 25% reservation and almost sole occupation of 25%
of original India!
This is a loot of not just jobs, the land and wealth as well.
Make Indian state spend vast sums of money on fighting terrorism and
costs on fighting Islamic terrorism (supported and sponsored by Indian
Muslim community) are increasing at a rate well-surpassing the economic
growth rate. Under these circumstances India will not be able to make
necessary infrastructural and educational investments to make products to
complete globally. There will be a large security markup on its products.
Uniform/secular laws bring Indian Muslims main stream, away from jihad and
out of the grip of medieval clergy. Hence clergy demand special laws that
originate from medieval “sharia”; they alone are “authorized” to
Increase Muslim population in India through infiltration, preferably
makes every sense for Indian Muslims to increase their population in every
way, especially in border areas so that Islam’s fascist borders could be
Sponsor insurgency in Muslim majority areas and engineer riots in Muslim
is done to destabilize India and to energize and increase clerical grip
over Muslim masses. India's only Muslim majority area of Kashmir has seen
a Muslim sponsored insurgency and a study conducted in 1970s showed that
more than 95% riots involving Muslims were started by them (Hindu majority
simply doesn't have the kind of institutionalization to initiate and
Undermine India’s relations with Israel and America
nations that are at the frontline fighting Islamic fascism, it is not in
Indian Muslim interests that
relations with these two nations, especially one between India and Israel
Make sure that no decisive action is taken against Pakistan for its
terrorist acts in India and help make the border between
and Pakistan soft so that western India is flooded with Pakistani
Muslims, just like
Pakistan being the primary jihad exporting country and the one that will
make Islamic conquest of India reality, it is in Indian Muslim interests
to see that Pakistan is protected and helped in every way possible.
Right of preemption
Since the Sept.11, 2001 attacks, America decided to embrace the right of
preemption – that is, it will take the war to the enemy before the enemy
consolidates or becomes a major threat.
Before Sept. 11
too faced difficult options with regard to Islamic fascism, along the
lines similar to what India faces (discussed above). Due to that
either chose to make ineffective or half-hearted attempts, but the Sept.
11 attacks changed all of that.
dynamics of Islam in
South Asia shows a very clear direction – destruction of
India and its eventual
islamization. From every Muslim majority area of
South Asia (also called old
India), where Muslims
have power, most Hindus have been driven out. Hence India has the right to
undertake a preemptive war on institutions sustaining Islamic fascism. In
rest of the article I develop terms of the preemptive war, and who would
initiate and conduct the war.
case due to a disorganized majority that couldn’t support the regimes in
power, these regimes (that are being dictated by minorities in India) are
not capable of conducting war at this time. So, what are the options?
option is that of concerned members of the majority community to take the
war on select enemy leadership within India. The right of survival and
self-defense in the absence of government’s inability to protect its
citizens makes this unavoidable -- and necessary.
Islamic fascism’s war strategies rely heavily on Muslim clerics
indoctrinating Muslim civilians and converting warriors out of them and
use every means of waging a war. Hence this is an unconventional war in
every sense – requiring the embattled “infidel” civilians to wage a
counter warfare on ”Generals” of jihad.
Liquidating enemy combatants
war or the jihad that has been imposed on India is based on indoctrinating
Muslim civilians to wage various forms of jihad on the State and
non-Muslim populations, specifically majority Hindus. The generals of this
jihad are mostly Indian Muslim clergy. An effective response requires not
only punishing sections of Indian Muslim populations aiding this jihad but
also treat these generals as enemy combatants.
Based upon the forms of jihad discussed above, I am defining a term “Indian
jihadi sympathizer”, including non-Muslims, as someone who:
supports special assistance and in particular, reservation for Indian
supports the existence of special laws for Indian Muslims at the expense
of uniform civil code
rejects deportation of Bangladeshi Muslims in India
Exaggerate Muslim losses in acts of violence while downplaying Hindu
losses; ignore or downplay Muslim violence but magnify or even invent a
supports Article 370, defining special status for
discourages close Indo-American or Indo-Israel relations
addition to the above requirements, I am defining another category called
“Indian jihadi”, as a person who in addition satisfies three more
An Indian Muslim leader who has recently and consistently demanded
“secularism” in Muslim minority India but supports Islamic law in Muslim
An Indian Muslim leader who exaggerates Muslim losses in acts of
violence while downplaying Hindu losses; ignore or downplay Muslim role
in acts of violence but magnify or even invent a Hindu role
An Indian Muslim leader who accuses the majority of “oppressing” Indian
Muslims and asks Indian Muslims to confront the majority on “grievances”
while the reality has been that from every Muslim majority area of South
Asia non-Muslims have been mostly driven out
last three requirements uniquely and beyond any doubt, identify an Indian
Muslim leader as a jihadi. His/her intention and his/her plans are to
indoctrinate Indian Muslims into waging jihad of all forms toward
destroying and then converting Indian into an Islamic state. I am
proposing that it is legitimate (under the right of preemption) to
liquidate any Indian Muslim that falls in the above definition of an
Indian jihadi. Also, Indian jihadi sympathizers involved in
protecting or aiding Indian jihadis too could be liquidated under
the right of preemption.
Institutions that are staging grounds for Indian jihadis such as
mosques or madrasas are legitimate enemy military targets.
updated-definition of enemy combatants is necessary given the nature of
the war India faces, with the enemy well inside. For instance,
recently American military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff revised the definition
of enemy combatants.
has been waging a losing war of no-rules imposed by Indian jihadi
leadership, also identified as Islam’s power structure within India.
just most Muslim clerics in
fall in this definition of Indian jihadi. Indeed, many Muslim
politicians, businessmen, professionals --- lawyers, doctors, movie actors
etc too can be and are Indian jihadis. Indian Islam is so corrupt
and fascist that this evil transformation of many Indian Muslims to
Indian jihadis is an unfortunate reality (How
were Srilankan Hindus United?).
definition makes a focused and effective response to jihad possible. It
also doesn’t deliberately target innocent nationalistic Muslims, and gives
them power and reason to undercut jihadis and join the mainstream.
However, given the proven large-scale genocidal nature of Indian Muslim
community and the war of no-rules imposed by them on Hindu majority,
Indian Muslim casualty shouldn’t come in the way of war strategies. This
would be a definite recipe for eventual extermination of Hindus by Muslims
of South Asia.
How to ignite Hindu majority into massive action
the majority constituting over 70% India will live or die by them. India
with a weakening and disintegrating majority and at the border of Islam
will be overwhelmed by Islamic forces thereby making existence of other
non-Muslims not viable in the region. Recently, there has been a flurry of
meetings held by various Hindu nationalist organizations and political
parties I trying devise strategies on defeating jihad imposed on
These meetings have ended with meaningless appeal asking the government to
realize the threat and act (I explained before why the governments can’t
act effectively) or the common people to wake up to this genocidal
Common people, who are predominantly Hindu, are busy with their own lives,
from eking out a living or to help raise families. With Hindu majority not
indoctrinated unlike Indian Muslims or mobilized like Christians or Sikhs,
common Hindus are not going to act unless their personal security or
economic future is undermined. The slow squeeze or the nature of jihad
imposed by Indian Muslims is such that Hindus are slowly losing wealth,
opportunities and jobs without realizing why it is happening to them. As
this trend continues for years to come majority Hindu population will be
too poor and illiterate on the average and besides, Islamic fascists would
have increasingly occupied corridors of power through vote-bank politics
and reservation that Islamic conquest of India will become inevitable.
This will doom the majority Hindus.
becomes incumbent upon the beleaguered majority community members to
create a list of Indian jihadis in their localities and liquidate
them across India, not just in places like Kashmir or Assam. Once this
starts happening Muslim community in
under the grip of these jihadis will respond violently in indiscriminate
fashion against the majority and the state machinery in a massive way.
This violent response would indicate a massive support of jihadis among
Indian Muslim community and identifies the leaders of this agitation as
Indian jihadis, to be liquidated. This massive violence and disruption
carried out by Indian Muslims will severely affect the day-to-day
existence and the well-being of most Hindus on the sidelines. These Hindus
too will realize that they must eradicate Islamic fascism once and for all
to ensure their future. This then will convince most of the majority to
form a unified and a massive front against Islamic fascism. First, it will
lead to removal from power the current generation of Muslim ‘approved”
leaders of India. It will then lead to installing leaders who will have
the outlook and the mandate to eradicate Islamic fascism. It will also
lead to a mainstream media that is no longer intimidated by Islam and one
that will be protected by a strong and powerful majority and reflect
objectivity in its reporting. As part of the collective punishment it may
be legitimate and even necessary to deny jobs to Indian Muslims and impose
economic boycott of them – if nations can be sanctioned for errand or
criminal behavior, why not communities?
studies have shown that if Islam’s power structure (consisting of
Indian jihadis) is destroyed, Indian Muslims can be reconverted to
Hinduism quickly and the borders cleansed off of Muslim migrants (to
Pakistan and Bangladesh). Once these Islamic power structures are
destroyed and Indian jihadis liquidated it becomes very difficult to
mobilize Indian Muslim populations (The
Art of War on Terror). The need for librating most Indian Muslims
(from Islam to Hinduism) arises as there exists no reformed version of
Islam in India (ISLAMIC
INSTITUTIONS IN INDIA - Protracted Movement for Separate Muslim Identity?)
– i.e. the Indian Islam is fascism to the core. Hence it is a must to find
a permanent solution that is consistent for the well-being of everyone,
The approach I have outlined above is a proven one. It just requires only
a few Hindus at the initial stage to ignite the action, but exploits the
well-founded and justified fear and dislike of Indian Muslims among
majority. This is similar to how Muslim communities are mobilized into
sponsoring and participating in jihad: The clerics first create a sense of
“grievance” against the majority or the State through sermons. In the next
stage a small band of armed men are created to “protect” the Muslim
community. These men discriminately kill some members of majority or state
security forces and take shelter among the Muslim population. When the
retaliation comes from the majority or the state, it leads to many
“innocent” Muslim civilians killed in the cross-fire, and given the sense
of “grievance” already implanted, the whole Muslim community starts the
sponsorship of jihad. Muslim
insurgency was started this way and this is a proven technique used by
Muslims and other communities.
Imposing a war on the Generals of jihad may be the last and only effective
way the Hindu majority too can respond to defeat the jihad imposed on
Indian civilian Muslim clerics comprising mostly of Indian jihadis issue
their own diktats, run parallel governments based upon “sharia” and wage
various forms of jihad on majority civilians -- with regimes in power
either doing little to stop them or act as the jihadi proxy, Hindu
civilians have the right to determine who Indian jihadis and their
sympathizer associates are and liquidate them. This approach has a
great potential to neutralize radical Islam, making Muslim clerics all
over India suddenly vulnerable, and also no longer feeling “free” to
continue their jihad-oriented sermons that are at the root of the Islamic
problem in India.
Hindu organizations gain little by convening meetings and “pass”
resolution after resolution appealing to the governments to act. What is
needed is massive propagation of this plan. Even if 1% of Hindu population
in India execute initial stages of this plan (liquidating Indian
jihadis and their Indian jihadi sympathizer associates), it
will ignite a spark that will spiral into a massive Hindu movement.
Unemployed Hindu youths need to be told that due to the presence of
Muslims in India (when they have almost exclusive lands for them in South
Asia), the costs of battling Islamic terrorism, and due to the subsidies
and reservation given to Indian Muslims -- have led to much-reduced
opportunities of education and jobs for them (A
Hindu Movement Born,
Is Sikhism destined for dustbin of history?). Hence it is in their
interest to liquidate Indian jihadis and their jihadi
current regime in
elected through Muslim vote-bank is making every effort to stop eviction
of illegal Muslim Bangladeshis. This regime is acting as proxy for Islamic
fascism. Assamese Hindus must now start implementing the plan I have
outlined here. This plan has to be extended all over
as well. The Islamic problem is an ALL
problem, not just restricted to Assam or Kashmir.
Organizations representing Hindu interests should propagate these ideas
without getting into action at least initially, due to the possibility of
being banned by dhimmis in power. With all available evidence indicating
many mosques in India stocked with assorted weapons to conduct jihad, it
is inevitable that Hindus must arm themselves to battle Indian jihadis
and jihadi sympathizers -- with the regimes in power not capable to
dealing with Indian jihadis. Retired Hindu military
personnel need to get involved in arming and training the Hindu community.
This new warfare imposed by Indian Muslims and supported by neighboring
Muslim states requires just that.
I conclude this analysis with this poem, originally written by a
Jewish poet to describe Jewish failure to recognize Nazi extermination
intent before it was too late. It was modified to describe the proven
genocidal designs of Islamic fascism in the Indian-subcontinent since 1947
First they came for East Punjabi/Sindhi Hindus
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a East Punjabi/Sindhi Hindu
Then they came for Bangladeshi Hindus
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Bangladeshi Hindu
Then they came for Kashmiri Hindus
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Kashmiri Hindu
Then they came for Jammu Hindus
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Jammu Hindu
Then they came for Assamese Hindus
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Assamese Hindu
Then they came for West Bengali Hindus
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a West Bengali Hindu
Then they came for Kerala Hindus
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Kerala Hindu
Then Indian Muslim extremists finally came for me,
And there was no one left to speak out for me
Moorthy Muthuswamy PhD
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or weblisting page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author.