India News
Yellow Pages
 Classifieds
Tickets
iVarta.com

   News Home  |  India Classifieds  |  USA, Canada, India Yellowpages  |  Tickets  |  Contact us

  Congress and the Mahatma  
 

 

By: Shachi Rairikar
May 02, 2005
V
iews expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer is at the bottom.

 Feedback

The BJP has very aptly called the re-enactment of the historic Dandi march on its 75th anniversary a political gimmick of the Congress. The hypocrisy is evident when the Congress president inaugurates the event by administering a pledge to follow the path shown by Mahatma Gandhi while in practice the party has deserted the principles of the Mahatma long ago.

The Mahatma had very proudly said, “I am a Hindu because it is Hinduism which makes the world worth living.” Will the Congress dare to reiterate this statement? Gandhi’s love for Hinduism was no secret but in its effort to appear secular, the Congress has become allergic to everything that is Hindu. Will the so-called secular credentials of the Congress permit it to follow the path shown by Gandhi?

The Mahatma was very concerned about the cow and its protection. He had said, “My ambition is no less than to see the principle of cow protection established throughout the world. But that requires that I should set my own house thoroughly in order first.” Has the Congress tried to do anything in this direction? To them the issue is communal. Gandhi had said, “My religion teaches me that I should by personal conduct instill into the minds of those who might hold different views, the conviction that cow-killing is a sin and that, therefore, it ought to be abandoned.” Is it feasible for the Congress to follow this path shown by the Mahatma?

The Mahatma had championed the cause of Swadeshi, small scale and cottage industries. He had said, “I would say that if the village perishes India will perish too. India will be no more India. Her own mission in the world will get lost. The revival of the village is possible only when it is no more exploited. Industrialization on a mass scale will necessarily lead to passive or active exploitation of the villagers as the problems of competition and marketing come in. Therefore we have to concentrate on the village being self-contained, manufacturing mainly for use.” Nehru and his successors adopted the communist model and went for large-scale industries, contrary to Gandhi’s ideals. Can the Congress afford to go back to the village industry – the path shown by the Mahatma?

The Mahatma was gravely concerned about the education system established by the British. He had said, “I find daily proof of the increasing and continuing wrong being done to the millions by our false de-Indianising education”. He had said that “real freedom will come only when we free ourselves of the domination of Western education, Western culture and Western way of living which have been ingrained in us .. . Emancipation from this culture would mean real freedom for us”. Has the Congress done anything in rectify the education system given by the British? On the contrary any efforts to Indianise the education have been vehemently opposed and termed as “saffronisation” by the Congress. Would the Mahatma have approved of books which call ancient Hindus beef eaters and Guru Tegh Bahadur a plunderer?
The Mahatma held that proselytizing under the cloak of humanitarian work was unhealthy. He considered the aping of Europeans by the Indian converts to Christianity as a violence done to their country. He had said, “If instead of confining themselves purely to humanitarian work such as education, medical services to the poor and the like, they would use these activities of their for the purpose of proselytising, I would certainly like them to withdraw. Every nation considers its own faith to be as good as that of any other. Certainly the great faiths held by the people of India are adequate for her people. India stands in no need of conversion from one faith to another.” But the Congress under a Roman Catholic leader is supporting the cause of the missionaries and even awarding Padma Shree to those involved in religious conversions. Any opposition to the mal-practices of Christian missionaries is very quickly condemned as Hindu fanaticism.
The Mahatma fought against the caste system. But the Congress through its reservation policies has deepened the crevices in the Hindu society. The RSS has been fighting for the cause since its inception. In fact Mahatma Gandhi had said at a RSS rally in Delhi in 1947, “When I visited the RSS camp, I was very much impressed by your discipline and the complete absence of untouchability”.
Probably the only principle that the Congress picked up from the Mahatma is Muslim appeasement. It is no secret that Gandhi had on many occasions gone to great extent, at times unjustified, to please the Muslims, his sole intention being Hindu-Muslim unity to keep India undivided. Actually the Mahatma believed that, “The way to save the cow is not to kill or quarrel with the Mussalmans; the way to save the cow is to die in the act of saving the Khilafat without mentioning the cow.” Though his intentions were noble, he failed completely in this mission as is evident from the partition and the resulting bloodshed. The Congress has very religiously followed this failed principle of the Mahatma but with a malafide intention. It has been doing so just to keep its minorities vote bank intact, oblivious of the harm being done to the minorities and the country by such communal politics.

Imagine how hurt the Mahatma would have been if he were to witness the acts of the present day Congress men like Mani Shankar Aiyar who insert his quotation by removing Savarkar’s and then go around proclaiming that they eat beef and are so secular. Imagine how much pain the Mahatma would have endured had he witnessed the statement of T.R. Balu, a Congress ally, that he is ashamed of being born a Hindu. Just think of the insult shown to the Mahatma when people like Shivraj Patil equate Sonia Gandhi with Lord Ram, Gautam Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi. How can you expect a servile party submitting in front of its videshi leader to comprehend and stand for the Mahatma’s love for Swadeshi?

The Congress and secularists, who claim to have a monopoly over Mahatma Gandhi, have in practice very shamelessly deserted his principles. The bitter fact which the Congress may find hard to accept is that it’s chief rival the RSS has stolen the Mahatma from them. Ironically the RSS, which is blamed time and again by the leaders of Congress as the murderer of Gandhi, is in fact still fighting for the principles for which the Mahatma lived. While the Congress has kept him alive only in photographs, statues, names of roads and schools, the RSS has kept up the fight for the cause initiated by the Mahatma. The cause of Hinduism, cow protection, Swadeshi, Indianization of education, fighting against the conversion agenda of the Christian missionaries – the issues close to Mahatma’s heart are today issues close to the RSS. These issues have all come to be identified as “communal” in the India polity, the concern of the so-called “Hindu fanatics”. The Mahatma and his principles minus his soft corner for Muslims would make him “communal” in the eyes of the Congress. While Nathuram Godse only brought an end to the physical existence of Gandhi, the Congress is party to a greater sin, it put to end the ideology and philosophy of the Mahatma. In this respect, the real murderer of Gandhi is the Congress.

The Congress has never cared for the Mahatma or his principles. The pseudo-secular principles of the Congress force it to maintain distance from the Mahatma in principle. They have followed the Mahatma only selectively, to suit their own selfish motives. They have only used his name to lure the voters. Similar is the case with the minorities, tribals and low-caste Hindus. Congress has always used them as vote-banks, not caring for their upliftment or their integration into the mainstream Indian society. Merely talking about sarva dharma sambhav, singing vaishnav janato and appeasing minorities through commissions and reservations does not prove proximity to the Mahatma. Treading the same path followed by the Mahatma 75 years ago is emulating him only symbolically. But what is needed today is not just melodrama but adopting Mahatma’s principles in practice. It is easy to take an oath to follow the path shown by him but will the political compulsions allow the Congress to actually do so in practice? For this hoax to turn into reality, the Congress will have to shed off its fake secular garb and adorn a saffron outfit.

Until then the Dandi yatra remains a nautanki, a political gimmick.

Shachi Rairikar

       Send your views to author

Do you wish to reach our readers? submit your guest column

Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or weblisting page URL) without the prior permission from us and the author.

Previous by:
Shachi Rairikar

Mr. Singh, Don’t Play With The History April 05, 2005

For the sake of Democracy? March 13, 2005

Goa: Murder of democracy February 12, 2005

The Hindu Art of Self Hate January 22, 2005

Why Celebrate Christmas? December 26, 2004

Media’s Disgusting Double Standards December 01, 2004

Know More About the RSS November 12, 2004

Fake Historians & Sold Media September 19, 2004

The Indian Science of Aeronautics March 12, 2004

 


 

Terms of Service | Join mailing list | Write Guest Columns | Sitemap