By:
Moorthy Muthuswamy PhD
December 20, 2004
(The views
expressed here are author’s own. The writer is a nuclear physicist based
in America. He is also a director of Indian American Intellectuals Forum,
a New York-based non-profit organization. His contact address:
MoorthyM@comcast.net)
Introduction
Objectively, fairly
and humanely how much reservation Indian Muslims should get? Answer: ZERO!
In fact, Indian Muslims already have a 25% reservation.
Indian Muslims
already grabbed 25% of the land for themselves in South Asia and drove out
almost all non-Muslims. Hence this constitutes a 25% Muslim reservation!
Along with this reservation Muslims are now free (due to their presence
in India) to compete for the 75% of the opportunities available to South
Asian non-Muslims.
Hindus or other
non-Muslims have unfairly lost 25% of the opportunities to Muslims.
Additional reservations for Muslims will further reduce opportunities for
non-Muslims. In fact, going by the logic of Partition and the subsequent
non-Muslim ethnic cleansing from Muslim majority areas to India, all
opportunities (100% reservation) in India must be reserved for
non-Muslims.
In addition, the
jihadi-infested and friendly UPA regime in Delhi has called for 20%
reservation for Indian Muslims in paramilitary forces.
All of this is being
carried out without any study – just to please the jihadis.
License, arms and training to kill Hindus
The ongoing jihad in
India’s only Muslim majority state of Kashmir is no coincidence. All the
available evidence points to extremization of most Indian Muslims. The
following poll was published in a Muslim-owned newspaper Mid-Day:
“A recent poll
revealed that just under 90 per cent of Mumbai’s Muslims, presumably the
most progressive in the country, rejected a secular civil code preferring
instead Shariah law, favoring polygamy, triple talaq and Islam’s unequal
inheritance laws which allow women half as much property as they allow
men. The views of most younger and educated Muslims and of women were also
the same, in almost the same proportion.”
This shows that most
Indian Muslims are outside of the civilized norms of behavior and outlook.
Many Muslim security personal are known to engage in jihad and also shield
jihdists. This has been the case not just in Kashmir but also in places
such as Marad, Kerala
Under these
circumstances to hire Indian Muslims as part of the paramilitary forces to
provide “security” to Hindu population is nothing less than giving license
to kill Hindus. The jihadi undermining of these forces is also highly
likely.
Muslim reservation is indeed jihad
With the goal of
jihadis is to destroy the economic viability of India and increase Muslim
population through high birth-rates and massive infiltration from
Bangladesh, it makes sense to reserve jobs for Indian Muslims. These
reservations serve two purposes: 1) Deserving Hindus are kept away from
jobs and become poor 2) undeserving Indian Muslims (who have shown strong
leanings to extremism) get jobs and become more wealthy.
This unfair wealth
transfer from Hindus to Indian Muslims through reservation is a must to
destroy India. Hence we see the equation: Muslim reservation = jihad!
This on top of
subsidies and other modes of wealth transfer are already making Hindus
poor. The cannibalistic characteristics of Indian Muslims are beginning to
get noticed (How
were Srilankan Hindus United?).
UPA Hindus must now decide which side they are on
The policies pursued
by the UPA regime have now created apprehension among Hindus and
particularly so, among security agencies. With the regimes in power
already proven in their inability to protect Hindus – as it happened in
Kashmir and other places – now the UPA regime can be arguably seen to
promote the interests of jihadists.
With Hindus and
others no where else to live other than India, non-Muslim communities will
find the need to wage a war to defend themselves. The politicians of the
UPA regime who allow unfair transfer of wealth to Muslims at the expense
of non-Muslims and who hire potential jihadists as paramilitary police --
will likely find themselves and their families at the cross hairs of
disgruntled Indian security forces who might view them as the traitors.
Most non-Muslims
have been driven out or were killed in Islamic Pakistan or Bangladesh. It
didn’t matter whether they were secular or Marxists. Hence these Hindu
politicians must understand that appeasing Islam is a no-win situation.
Don’t these politicians have any gratitude toward their Hindu security
guards and their families who protect them Islamic terrorists? Is Ms.
Sonia Gandhi heartless too?
Appeasing Muslim
vote bank has gone far enough. The so-called “secular” Hindu politicians
must now decide if they want to be on the side of jihad or with
civilization.
Just because the UPA
politicians don’t know how to defeat militant Islam doesn’t mean there is
no solution. I have come up with a detailed vision of permanently
defeating militant Islam within about a year (How
can India Defeat Militant Islam?,
Islam’s Weakness).
Hindu nationalists must act
Hindu nationalists
must fight tooth and nail on the issue of Muslim reservation in jobs,
education and in security forces along the lines I have articulated here.
If properly articulated I am confident that Hindus can be mobilized.
These issues are not
just bread-and-butter issues; they are in fact life-death-issues for
non-Muslims and in particular, Hindus of India.
Time has come to tell Indian Muslims that if they
insist on reservation they should leave for Pakistan or Bangladesh – the
lands reserved just for them and almost devoid of non-Muslims. Their quota
of 25% couldn’t be increased any further -- in fact, the logic of 1947
Partition requires 100% reservation for non-Muslim Indians. To say so is
not communal -- but a fair, humane and objective thing to do!
Is the RSS/VHP/BJP
leadership capable of articulating these thoughts boldly and come to the
aid of Hindus?
Moorthy Muthuswamy PhD
Do you wish to reach IndiaCause readers?
Write @ IndiaCause
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The author is solely responsible for the contents of the
opinion/column/letter. IndiaCause does not represent or endorse the
accuracy, completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal,
advice or any other information in the article. Our readers are free to
forward this page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or
distributed by others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or
weblisting page URL) without the prior permission from
IndiaCause and the author.