|
|
By:
Chinmay Bajekal
October 25, 2004
The subject of ´India´ and ´Hinduism´, and their relationship is one of
hot debate between the so-called Hindu nationalists on the one hand and
the pseudo-secularists and other opponents of Hindu nationalism on the
other. This article aims at making a realistic assessment of the
relationship between the two entities—´India´ and ´Hinduism´, from a
nationalist’s perspective.
To begin with, let us enlighten ourselves with what some of our leaders
during the freedom struggle had to say on this subject. Annie Wood Besant,
a senior leader of the Congress Party, during the freedom struggle,
expressed herself in the following words: “After a study of some forty
years and more of the great religions of the world, I find none so
perfect, none so scientific, none so philosophical and none so spiritual
than the great religion known by the name of Hinduism. Make no mistake,
without Hinduism, India has no future. Hinduism is the soil into which
India’s roots are stuck and torn out of that she will inevitably wither,
as a tree torn out from its place. And if Hindus do not maintain Hinduism,
who shall save it? If India’s own children do not cling to her faith, who
shall guard it. India alone can save India and India and Hinduism are
one.”
Annie Besant was not the only one to hold such views. Her views were
shared by yet another freedom fighter ´Rishi Aurobindo´, also known as
´the thinker of modern India´. ´In a brilliant speech, Aurobindo equated
the Indian land with Sanatana Dharma or Hindu religion which is but
another name for the yearning of the Divine or the quest of the Spirit. He
also said that in India religion and nationalism are one. India rises with
religion, lives by it and will perish with it and to rise in religion is
to raise India.” (Source: The Soul of India, by Satyavrata R. Patel, p.
206.)
It is unfortunate that the party whose leaders once held such views is
today so strongly opposed to ´Hindu nationalism´. There is also an attempt
by some to separate nationalism and Hinduism. But sadly they forget that
the concept of ´Motherland´ or ´Mathrubhoomi´ itself originated from the
Hindu philosophy. It is the Hindu philosophy that makes us see a mother in
other objects other than our own biological mother. The Hindu sees a
´river´, ´cow´, and his ´land´ as his sacred mother. ´Vande mataram´ is a
song that expresses the love and devotion of a Hindu towards his
motherland in the true sense of the term. Thus ´Hindu nationalism´ could
be precisely described as ´Bharatiya-oriented nationalism´.
To realize the significance of the existence and domination of Hindu
culture/way of life in India, we need to look at those regions in the
Indian subcontinent where once upon a time Hinduism flourished and today
it hardly exists there. Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh are some
good examples. Afghanistan was once a region where Hinduism did flourish
and it was a multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society where Hindus, Sikhs,
Buddhists inhabited in large numbers. But today the region is flourishing
only with terrorism, sectarian-violence and war-mongerers. It only goes to
show that how, when a region of the Indian subcontinent is separated from
Hinduism, the region becomes alien to India.
Not just in Indian subcontinent but also around the world we have similar
examples related to other ancient civilizations. The ancient Greece of
Alexander and Acropolis, the Egypt of Pyramids, and the Persia of
Zoroastrians (Parsis) all were ancient civilizations like India but today
all that remains of them is mere monuments. We learn from these examples
that when the culture/way of life of a civilization is replaced by
another, it results in the total annihilation of the civilization. Thus to
put it in precise words, the culture and way of life constitute the ´soul´
of a civilization whereas the ´land´ and ´people´ only constitute the
necessary physical attributes of a nation.
Thus protecting ´Hinduism´ is in the true sense of the term protecting the
very ´being´, ´existence´ and ´soul´ of India.
As I end my article I would like to conclude its theme in the following
poetic phrases:
India is our motherland,
Hinduism her soul,
This who doesn’t understand,
Plays an anti-Indian role! ´
Chinmay Bajekal
Do you wish to reach IndiaCause readers?
Write @ IndiaCause
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The author is solely responsible for the contents of the
opinion/column/letter. IndiaCause does not represent or endorse the
accuracy, completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal,
advice or any other information in the article. Our readers are free to
forward this page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or
distributed by others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or
weblisting page URL) without the prior permission from
IndiaCause and the author. |
Previous
by:
Chinmay Bajekal
Indian virtues pre-date
‘secularism’! October 16, 2004 |